[Swordmaker]

"The SIF will be loaded on the SUBJECT DEVICE at either a government facility, or alternatively, at an Apple facility; if the latter, Apple shall provide the government with remote access to the SUBJECT DEVICE through a computer allowing the government to conduct passcode recovery analysis."

Where in that sentence does it say Apple gets to KEEP the SUBJECT DEVICE evidence? How is it going to prevent some man-in-the-middle hacking of the device while the "government" (which department in the government? which agency?) accesses the device to its heart's content and reads and copies the unlocking code?

I STILL DON'T SEE the WORDS "APPLE GETS TO KEEP THE NOW COMPROMISED SUBJECT DEVICE!"

DO YOU?

If it is NOT written in the order, Ray, it's not in the order.

[Ray76]

> Where in that sentence does it say Apple gets to KEEP the SUBJECT DEVICE

The original claim made was “the power to break everyone’s phones will remain in the hands of Apple”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3400821/posts?page=99#99

During discussion this morphed to “keep the device”