Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Janet Yellen Risks Another Downturn
Real Clear Markets ^ | February 22, 2016 | Peter Morici

Posted on 02/22/2016 4:03:30 AM PST by expat_panama

Washington policymakers - and their colleagues abroad - have pursued reckless and irresponsible economic policies. The chickens are coming home to roost, and the Federal Reserve could easily push America into another recession.

Prior to the 2008 financial meltdown, governments in the United States, Europe and Japan piled up debt to finance social programs they could not afford, and encouraged private individuals to borrow too much against real estate. All this to maintain consumer spending and modest growth, when government regulators meddling in virtually every business and hiring decision curbed private investment.

China, instead of implementing needed market reforms, artificially suppressed the value of the yuan, subsidized domestic industries with easy credit and protected them from foreign competition. Those boosted exports and accelerated the decline of manufacturing in Western economies.

When the credit bubbles burst, Western leaders uniformly scapegoated the banks. And they further expanded social spending, failed to reform oppressive business regulations and appeased China on currency manipulation and protectionism that together were holding up growth in the first place.

With the banks now constrained by examiners peeking over their every shoulder and less inclined to lend, central banks recklessly printed money to pump liquidity directly into credit markets. For example, quantitative easing has boosted Bank of Japan holdings to a whopping 75 percent of gross domestic product.

In Japan and Europe, monetary authorities have now pushed interest rates below zero - banks now charge large depositors for the privilege of stashing cash - and have joined China in pushing their currencies down against the dollar.

Cheap currencies boosted exports a bit but absent more fundamental reforms, those can't resurrect growth.

U.S. growth during the Bush-Obama era is about half that accomplished during the Reagan-Clinton years and again appears to be faltering. Jobs creation may still look good for now, but hiring decisions tend to lag changes in broader conditions and could quickly go south.

Right now, the U.S. economy is held up by consumer spending. Few private businesses are willing to finance new projects with credit remaining tight and Washington tagging them the villain for all of society's problems.

A year ago conditions were better, but the Fed missed the opportunity to begin raising interest rates to more normal levels, and finally increased those marginally above zero in December.

Now the Fed is between a rock and a hard place. If it raises rates further, it will suppress faltering business investment and sales of big-ticket consumer items, such as cars and appliances. But taking interest rates into negative territory in the style of the Bank of Japan and European Central Bank risks destabilizing financial markets.

Japanese and European monetary authorities are discovering banks face difficulties charging most depositors for the privilege of keeping money in their vaults, and negative interest rates don't encourage more lending when banks see mindless government regulation, not the cost of money, as the problem.

More importantly, negative interest rates drive down bank profits and stock prices.

The realization that central banks have it wrong - pushing down currencies against the dollar doesn't resurrect growth, and negative interest rates only serve to destabilize banks - is causing capital flight of all kinds. In China, investors are selling stocks and rushing into dollars, and in Japan and Europe, they are dumping stocks for government bonds.

During recent testimony before Congress, Fed Chairman Janet Yellen acknowledged deteriorating foreign economic conditions and stock market turbulence pose risks for the U.S. economic expansion - tepid as it may be - but paradoxically stated both her desire to raise interest rates and that she is considering negative interest rates.

Plainly, Ms. Yellen is clueless about what to do next, and won't call out the administration for spending and regulating business too much and making the Fed's job impossible.

Ms. Yellen hardly inspires confidence, and that is a prescription for disaster.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; investing; yellen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
They know it too which is why they voted to turn it over to the fed in the first place. Now they can get away w/ just saying they could do better w/o ever having to actually prove it.
21 posted on 02/23/2016 5:21:47 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

The chickens are coming home to roost, and the Federal Reserve could easily push America into another recession.

...

That’s the Fed’s job. Actually, it is to suppress wages, but causing recessions is a big part of that.


22 posted on 02/23/2016 5:25:58 AM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer
There will always be markets for money even if it completely black. Thus the idea that anyone can regulate the value is kind of panglossian. The only real question is the mix of market and politics.

Makes sense to me

 Just recently the Fed printed up money and gave it to politicians to spend which is pretty dumb.

Wait a sec, I thot we'd already agreed that congress' coining/setting-value of money was in the constitution. How about our beef geing not w/ the fed, but w/ congress?

23 posted on 02/23/2016 5:33:41 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

Fair enough. It is Constitutional and dumb for politicians to print money and spend it. It is not the worst case scenario because the proportion is still small, it may have been temporary and it was not just handed out in paper. But it is a bad precedent and I’m not sure if anyone realizes how damaging that is with all the talk about deflation.


24 posted on 02/23/2016 6:42:47 AM PST by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson