Baloney. This whole article cites the CArson campaign as their source. From the article:
“The meeting, which the Carson campaign confirmed to The Beast, took place prior to the Conservative Review convention and lasted nearly 25 minutes despite Carson only agreeing to five minutes, a source said. It took so long Carson was late to his speaking arrangement during the convention.
“We weren’t going to comment to the press on it, but it seems pretty clear that the other party involved had a different agenda,†Jason Osborne, a spokesperson for Carson’s campaign told The Beast. “How else could we perceive that to be?â€
The whole article was written with the perspective of the Carson campaign. You think that Cruz’s people would leak to the press that Carson only agreed to 5 minutes but Cruz took 25 minutes and made Carson late?
That whole comment about “the other party had a different agenda... How else could we perceive that to be?” seems to be a poorly-framed insinuation that the other party wanted to disclose the meeting but it’s obvious that this article relies on Carson sources, not Cruz sources.
Please just stop twisting things - and then insinuating that Cruz’s people are doing the very thing you are doing, and then playing “the ever so Jesus loves me junk”.
What does this mean?
“We weren’t going to comment to the press on it, but it seems pretty clear that the other party involved had a different agenda, Jason Osborne, a spokesperson for the Carson’s campaign told The Beast. How else could we perceive that to be?”
The Daily Beast went to the Carson campaign and the Carson campaign ‘confirmed’ to The Beast......... confirmed what exactly....
There is a whole lot of baloney but apparently you are reading right over the baloney.