Huh, time is of the essence. IIRC the hearing on the 35 page filing is scheduled in a month. If that is what the court thinks is a timely response to the issue then there is hyper-ventilating going on.
Has the govt prosecuted its employee who tampered with the evidence and prevented Apple from providing the data derived from a Cloud copy. It’s not Apple’s fault that our highly compensated govt employees screw up.
> IIRC the hearing on the 35 page filing is scheduled in a month.
It doesn’t change the fact the time is of the essence. But it’s been how many months now? The trail is cold. So let’s let it get colder.
> prevented Apple from providing the data derived from a Cloud copy
The cloud backup is encrypted. A pwd change does not change that fact.