Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zedee
Exactly. One of Apple's biggest legal arguments in this case is that the feds' request that they create a new version of iOS (which would enable the phone to be unlocked using brute force techniques) creates an "unreasonable burden." As soon as Apple creates the version of iOS the feds are seeking here, you can bet that any time the feds want info from a locked phone in the future, they would run to court arguing that "we know for a fact that Apple possesses a software tool that would enable us to unlock this phone," and thus that there is no additional burden from requiring them to use the software again.

Yup. Now, how hard do you think it will be for the feds to have some compliant judge to robo-sign every single request submitted? I figure it would take about 1 minute.

 

 

196 posted on 02/19/2016 3:20:27 PM PST by zeugma (Lon Horiuchi is the true face of the feral government. Remember that. Always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: zeugma
Yup. Now, how hard do you think it will be for the feds to have some compliant judge to robo-sign every single request submitted? I figure it would take about 1 minute

If even that long. I'm sure every FBI agent and federal prosecutor in every district already knows a compliant judge who would sign off on the request.

209 posted on 02/19/2016 4:11:59 PM PST by zedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson