Posted on 02/19/2016 6:59:10 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Are you an agent-provocateur for the establishment cabal, or do you think that Ted Cruz is Yah’s dedicated servant to restore Christian dominance in America, or are you just so blind you can not see what is going on in America, today?
RE: Are you an agent-provocateur for the establishment cabal
I posted an article, how does that make me an agent-provocateur for the establishment cabal?
Why not refute the article? It was posted precisely for you to do that, not to impugn a fellow FReeper’s motives.
McMeathead = Trump? Wasn’t it drunkard Beck and his pet travel monkey Cruz say something about Scalia’s death as an omen to vote for Ted “Dudley DoRight” Cruz?
When you have nothing of note to say, call names.
There were probably a half dozen “coincidences” about Scalia’s death that make it look very suspicious and when I pointed them out, a bunch of so-called “conservatives” shouted me down. The unanswered questions are all very legitimate for an “ordinary Joe” dying under these circumstances, much less a Justice of the US Supreme Court.
I thought the Scalia Family pleaded with folks not to do “conspiracy theories” on the Rush Limbaugh Show the other day?
So, based on the various posters on this thread — WHO are the conspiracy theorists?
* The ones who suspect foul play
* The ones who insist there is NO foul play
Or muffling the screams from poisoning. We don’t have security footage from the hall, elevator (if necessary) or outside.
The body was destroyed, even though a Scalia was a devout Catholic.
No autopsy.
So, we’ll never know...unless someone took some evidence in the process, just to save their own skin.
On the other hand, dead men tell no tales. The handlers better watch themselves and their families.
THAT is a valid point.
Some people just cannot handle Faux News and others calling them that dreaded name “conspiracy theorist”! They just need to be loved by everyone and are particularly sensitive when dumb people think they are dumb.
Exactly. And then you’ve got a guy who is supposed to be in “bad health” in a desert, a 100 miles from nowhere? Who “on their last leg”, as they claim, does this?
Exactly.
There are those on this board who apparently need to shout down obvious motive, opportunity, or circumstantial evidence problems.
I have talked with a few people who know others with experience in various cases. To a man, they call this murder. Ordered by hewhoshallnotbenamed.
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CR/htm/CR.49.htm
So maybe if they followed the law, then there would be limited justification to question the cause of death.
I put our three possibilities, you picked number one.
How can one refute this article? The federal statutes require an complete autopsy when a senior Federal Government official dies. They didn’t even follow the local police procedures. They washed and embalmed his body within 24 hours of his death. As far as we know there aren’t even any “crime scene” photos. The security cameras had malfunctioned. There is just nothing available to determine what actually happened to Justice Scalia.
So when you have a President who has bragged about being ‘really good at killing people’, one would have to be part of the problem not to question the circumstances.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/4/obama-brag-new-book-im-really-good-killing-drones/
The body was not flown back to Virginia, nor did it get taken to a local funeral home there in the small town. Instead, it was taken to not one but TWO separate funeral homes, the last being near El Paso.
Maybe the first funeral home didn’t have an oven that was hot enough to destroy all the evidence.
So, where is the "damning video"? Was he solely responsible for it, with no input from other staff members? Or was there an infil-traitor on his staff who disappeared it?
As with a lot of other issues, the question of whether Scalia was assassinated or not is going to devolve into two sets of people: Those who look at the evidences and at least suspect that he was, and those who are more interested in appearing “respectable†to the Washington elite and harumph harumph about how “unacceptable†it is to even suggest it.
<><><><<
And both groups do so based on their preconceived notions, fantasies and whatnot, given that they have exactly zero access to any evidence whatsoever. Listening to talking heads talk about stuff ain’t evidence.
When the family suggests that the conspiracy nuts shut up, well, that pretty much says it all.
Just that the family pleaded that there be no conspiracy theories.
Neat bed clothes with his hands folded as if for ‘display’.
You know, in a heart attack, you would at least muss up the sheets a little. And you wouldn’t fold your hands in a display, like in a casket.
I saw my father in bed, during a heart attack. His knees bent, he sat up, grabbed the covers, then put his arm out on the bed.
That people take the official description seriously is ridiculous, especially under 0bama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.