Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/19/2016 1:36:09 AM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; Airwinger; Aliska; altair; ...
Editorial comment from reader comments on Mac Daily News on the Apple/FBI legal melee. The author says he's a 30 year experienced prosecutor who sides with Apple in this disagreement and gives some very good arguments why. -- PING!


Apple v. FBI commentary from a Prosecutor
Ping!

The latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword "ApplePingList" on FreeRepublic's Search.

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me

2 posted on 02/19/2016 1:39:04 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

All this would be prevented by a government agency which would have the best computers attached to the largest data banks recording everyone’s digital communications. This wonder agency could work with friendly nations around the planet to capture everyone’s digital emmisions 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Whether a cell call, an email or a photo with hidden layers this government agency would capture and analysis all this digital information almost in real time. It would cost maybe hundreds of billions but the ability to prevent an attack such as Boston would be worth it. Image knowing the perpetrators before hand. They could be watched, special trained personnel could be at the event watching for the perpetrators. We would all live in safe world. And not even our leaders would think of using such an agency to spy on their rivals, either internationally or domestically to turn this agency into a digit machiavellian tool to crush rivals and push an individual leader’s goals.


5 posted on 02/19/2016 2:26:47 AM PST by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

BFL


7 posted on 02/19/2016 3:55:41 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Bookmark.


8 posted on 02/19/2016 3:56:22 AM PST by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Our president considers pro-lifers and the NRA to be the REAL threat to our security. There is no serious question as to how technology will be used for domestic political purposes. Think about the IRS and the Tea Party.


13 posted on 02/19/2016 5:26:47 AM PST by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
The subject of a warrant is under no obligation to assist the government in executing the warrant. That burden falls on the shoulders of the government.

The 4th Amendment does not say we have a right to “...be secure in our “persons, houses, papers, and effects” as long as the government has access, if needed. If the government wins on this, a precedent will have been set. Our rights will end where this new right of the government begins. I cannot believe how many people are willing to go down this road because in this case, they are after terrorists (who are already dead, BTW). If we lose our rights in this war against terror, the terrorists win. Period.

The endgame for the government is access to every encrypted device, not just this one phone. Think about this. Apple has done what the Federal Government can't—protect sensitive data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2015/07/09/hack-of-security-clearance-system-affected-21-5-million-people-federal-authorities-say/

“...Two major breaches last year of U.S. government databases holding personnel records and security-clearance files exposed sensitive information about at least 22.1 million people, including not only federal employees and contractors but their families and friends, U.S. officials said Thursday...”

The Federal Government cannot secure the personal data of their employees, contractors, families and friends. How can they promise our devices will remain secure? They can't, not with a straight face anyway.

14 posted on 02/19/2016 5:40:14 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

There is a really good discussion about the FBI request to Apple on Twit.tv with Leo LaPorte, “The Tech Guy” and Steve Gibson from “Security Now” (he joins the discussion in the middle of the show).

It is on the Twit.TV show “This Week in Google”. You can watch it by streaming the video, or downloading the video or audio (for free) at this URL.

https://twit.tv/shows/this-week-in-google/episodes/340?autostart=false


15 posted on 02/19/2016 5:42:47 AM PST by r_barton (We the People of the United States...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

DOJ has jumped into the mix

http://abcnews.go.com/US/doj-escalates-battle-apple-san-bernardino-shooters-phone/story?id=37056775


23 posted on 02/19/2016 10:57:31 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

later


24 posted on 02/19/2016 11:22:53 AM PST by Albion Wilde (Who can actually defeat the Democrats in 2016? -- the most important thing about all candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson