“Could well include”
However, does not now include. So a conservative view would indeed, still exclude Cruz.
Wat the hell are you talking about now?
You zero in on the only provisional sounding portion of what I just wrote to you while fully ignoring the meaning of all the rest?
This is really beginning to piss me off. It's like you're so dishonest with yourself -- within yourself in regards to this issue, now you're being disingenuous with me.
I'm going to need more than a sentence fragment. Try capturing a complete thought, perhaps more than one.
Quote that much (how much does it cost to copy and paste???) then maybe I could see what you may *think* you have.
Doubtless, its something I've already covered with you or the other guy just now recent.
Ok, how about DAMN WELL then included, as change of wording?
Better now? Can you deny that it did at that time include those wordings? Say it, and quite all this pathetic squirming around you've been doing in birther-baggage delusion-land.
You've got nothing but that (I can't even say the rest of the words on this forum, it's that bad).