Ok, how about DAMN WELL then included, as change of wording?
Better now? Can you deny that it did at that time include those wordings? Say it, and quite all this pathetic squirming around you've been doing in birther-baggage delusion-land.
You've got nothing but that (I can't even say the rest of the words on this forum, it's that bad).
Doesn’t “damn well” include what we have now.
Have we a situation where the Constitution is using an orphan term?
Well if it is, then yes we now have tea leaf reading on our hands, and I can say my tea leaf reading is as good as yours, and it (an assuredness factor) would speak persuasively to the minds of a lot of the members of the USSC. Which like it or not, our present Constitution has left to be the ultimate umpire short of something like Bork amendment.