He’d be far worse that Bush, who actually had some good ideas but was weak at defending them and then finally surrendered to the leftist press and the Dems (we do have to remember held the legislature and were very powerful). Bush’ failing was, if anything, that he was too much of a gentleman, never defended himself, and was so conciliatory he looked like he was working for the other side. But he did have a moral compass and some principles.
Trump has none, either in his personal life or his business life. Anything that benefits him is ok - so he’ll be out there not only making deals with the left, but even adopting their more extreme positions (since as Bernie is showing, that’s what sells). However, like Clinton, he’ll make sure that there’s something in it for him.
The Bush need to appear gentlemanly is more important to them than their duty to the Americans who were fooled into voting for them. I have contempt for their selfishness.
Dubya did work for the other side - the Religion of Peace. He left the borders open and cooperated with the invasion of our land. And Dubya did it with a cold superior attitude:
DATED: Feb 03, 2011
George Bush Says Tea Party Suffers From Nativism
Bush: What’s interesting about our country, if you study history, is that there are some ‘isms’ that occasionally pop up - pop up. One is isolationism and its evil twin protectionism and its evil triplet nativism. . .
http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/george-bush-says-tea-party-suffers-nati