Twitter fit ensues in 3, 2, 1....
He’s confident he can win, isn’t he? The Candidate.
|
If you would like to be added to the
|
This is like King Kong and Godzilla duking it out.
(Cue that “Aaaaannn-nughffth” sound Godzilla makes)
It is about time to get it on. Cruz better be careful for what he wishes for.
Bring it, Trump! Or are you afraid yet again?
I think we can clearly see now who is the coward in this race. Trump hides behind Twitter so well.
The Twitter president is just what we don’t need.
Twitter fit ensues in 3, 2, 1....
tronald dump is just a whiney oompa loompa with cotton candy on his head.
Interesting the Orange One is being directly called out like this. So, where’s the lawsuit?
Waaa! I'm being unfair!
Interesting is that Donald tried playing his suite tactics with the banks he owed 40 million to........tried saying that it was not his fault he was defaulting because the 2008 crash was an “Act of God” he could not control.....
When it went to court the bank quoted from Trumps own book as part of their defense...(Think Big and Kick Ass in Business and Life.)...
....In it, Trump said..... “I loved to crush the other side and take the benefits”... and mocked the banks that had lost money on loans made to him before another real estate downturn in the 1990s........He stated... “I figured it was the bank’s problem not mine... What the hell did I care?.. I actually told one bank. I told you you shouldn’t have loaned me that money. I told you the goddamn deal was no good.”
That may be considered an acceptable practice in the real estate development world, but it certainly isn’t the example of the business genius that Trump claims to be....he’s a shyster and swindler.
Ball’s in your court now, Trump. Put up or shut up.
Give it up Ted.
The fine points of the constitution are not frivolous and Trump makes him dance to a tune. It’s a tactic that Cruz fell for like an amateur. Cruz does not look like a leader if he is reacting to a charge.
Now Donald doesn’t have to sue. Who cares who wins a lawsuit? Cruz giving lots of attention to Trump’s threat to sue neutralizes any affect the ad may have had. Think about it. When voters see the add they will now wonder if its true or not whereas before Cruz press conference people may have believed it. Voters will look at all Cruz’s ads with a grain of salt. All his ads will be neutralized even the ones against Rubio because Rubio campaign also is calling Cruz a liar. Cruz may look smug in his press conference but he spent a lot of money on ads that he himself just neutralized.
All of this ‘dissension’ among the tow front-runners makes me laugh! ;-)
Doesn’t anyone remember the Ronald Reagan/George H. W. Bush name-calling episodes? Doesn’t anyone remember the ‘voodoo-economics’ speech?
RR/Bush ticket was the result.
I still say that if things keep going the way they are going then we’ll see a Trump/Cruz ticket. ;-)
That should satisfy almost all of us FReepers!
I saw Megyn Kelly interview Judge Napolitano last night, and he said Trump has no basis for suing Ted Cruz. She asked what chances Trump has of winning this case, and Judge said ZERO. He went on to say, “There are many many technical obstacles to this lawsuit, but in the midst of a political campaign, for him to say to his opponent, unless you apologize to me for something you said about me, and to Ben Carson for something you did to him, I’m going to sue you, the Federal courts would dismiss the suit on their own notion, and charge Donald Trump the cost that the others paid to resist the suit. It’s called frivolous pleadings...this is litigation 101.
http://therightscoop.com/it-has-zero-chance-judge-napolitano-on-the-donalds-trumped-up-lawsuit-threat-against-cruz/
Also as to the Iowa mailers, from a previous segment (since Trump keeps bringing it up)....Cruz didn’t do anything wrong. This is not an election, this was not run by the govt, this is a contest within a private group, called the Republican Party of Iowa, they set the laws, they set the rules, the state of Iowa does not, so the general laws that apply to a general election, do not apply here.
Secondly basic principle, politics is not beanbag....you can say rough and tough things, you can exaggerate, you can extrapolate, it is perfectly reasonable for Congressman King to have said, “this guy is going to Florida, he is out of here”, they reacted the same way, watching CNN, watching other news commentators speculate, they all reacted the same way. It is a rational inference he can make. The courts are not going to get in the business of second guessing words that people use, during campaigns.
As to the flyer, it would be impossible to prove that that flyer a) coerced people to vote who weren’t going to vote, and b) to vote for a specific candidate. It is unknowable and unprovable. NO lawyer would take that case.
Trump is making a political statement, there is no legal basis for having another Iowa caucus, no court would take a complaint, no court would inquire of a voter as to why they voted.
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/02/03/judge-napolitano-trump-has-no-legal-case-against-cruz-alleged-iowa-caucus-voter-fraud
As well, here is Judge Napolitano earlier in January, discussing how Cruz is eligible, so Trump can do whatever (which I doubt he will, because he’s all talk, no action)
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/01/11/judge-napolitano-ted-cruzs-american-citizenship-settled-and-established
This thread has some real irony.
I would love to know the complete history of the term “Birther”. IMHO, one of the best derogatory terms ever used in politics. It gave us Obama. In any case, Cruz and Obama use the term like playground bullies.
Trump for President. Destroy liberals, the sickness is all around us and look what it has done to America.