Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Exactly. Fourteen people are dead. There’s an obstruction of justice charge in there somewhere for this sanctimonious turd burglar. Feds come to him AFTER a crime has been committed, want him to provide access to his company’s product, and he refuses? He doesn’t have to show them how AAPL accesses the memory, but he does need to do provide the access.


45 posted on 02/17/2016 6:03:29 AM PST by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: ameribbean expat
Exactly. Fourteen people are dead. There’s an obstruction of justice charge in there somewhere for this sanctimonious turd burglar. Feds come to him AFTER a crime has been committed, want him to provide access to his company’s product, and he refuses? He doesn’t have to show them how AAPL accesses the memory, but he does need to do provide the access.

Actually, if someone were arrested due to data uncovered in the iPhone search, the defense attorneys for the arrestee would be entitled to all details of exactly HOW that data was extracted from that supposedly secure iPhone, including the technical details of how it was done to assure it was not manufactured data. Discovery can be a bitch that way. Apple discovered that in their own court cases when the judges ordered them to expose other "company secrets" to their competition.

195 posted on 02/17/2016 5:15:49 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson