Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could Barack Obama become a Supreme Court justice?
The Christian Science Monitor ^ | January 27, 2016 | Corey Fedde

Posted on 02/14/2016 10:32:55 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Can a former POTUS go to work on the SCOTUS? Hillary Clinton thinks so.

At an event in Iowa, an audience member asked Mrs. Clinton, a Democratic presidential candidate, whether she would nominate President Obama for a role on the Supreme Court if she became the next president. Mrs. Clinton responded immediately, according to CBS News:

Wow, what a great idea. Nobody has ever suggested that to me. Wow, I love that, wow. He may have a few other things to do, but I tell you that's a great idea ... He's brilliant and he can set forth an argument and he was a law professor. He's got all the credentials.

Currently, Supreme Court justices have an average age of around 75, according to birthdates available from the Supreme Court website. Four of the justices will be over 80 by the end of the next presidential term, leading many to assume that the next president, Republican or Democrat, will likely appoint at least one Supreme Court justice....

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obama; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Damn right—if the Democrats are not defeated in the November election.


81 posted on 02/15/2016 6:44:29 AM PST by Savage Beast (We see an ocean of crashing waves, as black holes create a violent storm in the fabric of space-time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

We can put nothing past him. Nothing at all.


82 posted on 02/15/2016 7:40:03 AM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

The sorry POS wouldn’t be up to the job. He is totally unqualified.
That is true, but he doesn’t want the job in any case. From the bottom of the article:

“When I got out of law school, I chose not to clerk,” he told the New Yorker. “Partly because I was an older student, but partly because I don’t think I have the temperament to sit in a chamber and write opinions.”

A wise choice at the time, and in retrospect, given his affirmative-action credentials.

Plus, actually working, as opposed to organizing, is no fun. Alinsky would no doubt back him up on that.

Then there is the problem that he is an ex-President. Ex-Presidents have lots of income opportunities that would have an “off” smell if the individual were a Justice! Best to cross off “federal judge” from the list of possible ex-presidential gigs! Speaking, yea! Opinion-writing, nay!

Zero isn’t Supreme Court material. If we win, he won’t get the offer. If they win, he’ll decline. It’s too much like a real job, not to mention, one for which he is not qualified!


Thank you for the most rational analysis. You are exactly right.


83 posted on 02/15/2016 7:55:49 AM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Obama would just make his clerks do all the work and just show up on occasions when the media was present.

Hillary is just pandering to the pro-Obama voters in her party. She hates Obama and would never select him. She would go for someone much younger and female.

84 posted on 02/15/2016 8:53:39 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: laplata
The sorry POS wouldn't be up to the job. He is totally unqualified ...

... and he is far, far too lazy.

85 posted on 02/15/2016 8:55:26 AM PST by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: glennaro

... and he is far, far too lazy.


That’s right.

After he leaves, he will combine partying with other Internationalists, New World Order Elites, in undermining the USA.


86 posted on 02/15/2016 9:14:11 AM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He wouldn’t take the job. He will be the wealthiest billionaire ex president in history. His filthy paws are in everything that will make money. Thebonly thing he wants more than money is power. And he can’t get it with 8 other people in the room.


87 posted on 02/15/2016 10:47:00 AM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

He’s not eligible to run again, even as VP.


88 posted on 02/15/2016 11:44:43 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
She would go for someone much younger and female.

Well, THAT we already know.

89 posted on 02/15/2016 1:45:55 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Soetoro, having “served” two terms as “President,” cannot be elected VP, because the VP must be eligible to the office of President. Of course, since Soetoro is an illegal alien...


90 posted on 02/15/2016 1:48:28 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

Yes Baraq and MooseChelle will tap a huge lode of cash for POTUS pardons and live like potentates for the next 40 years.

The Baraq Obama Foundation will make the Clinton Global Initiative look like play money.


91 posted on 02/15/2016 1:50:39 PM PST by nascarnation (RIP Scalia. Godspeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

Were they ever?


92 posted on 02/15/2016 1:54:21 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan; fieldmarshaldj
I'm not so sure. The Kennedy / Johnson scenario was addressed in the 22nd. A president is limited to 10 yrs so he may be eligible to serve another 2 yrs not by being elected.

Don't know if it's come up before.

Makes Scalia's untimely death dven more important.

93 posted on 02/15/2016 4:12:18 PM PST by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Not.

A VP who serves less than half of a deceased President’s term may run for two terms of his own. But a person who has served two full terms of his own cannot be elected VP in the hopes of serving two more years, just as he could not run for a third term as President while promising to resign after two years!


94 posted on 02/15/2016 5:32:58 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
I see your point and agree but it is not addressed directly in the 22nd and with the dems, the present regime and SCOTUS in flux...Don't be surprised if they try.

A friend brought it up and I told him that I'd look into it.

95 posted on 02/15/2016 7:28:28 PM PST by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

I know that the amendment does not define the term limit as “eight years” or “ten years.” It speaks of “terms.” No one is permitted, after being elected to and serving two terms as POTUS, to be elected again, or to serve any additional time as POTUS. Thus, no one who has served eight years as POTUS is allowed to be elected VP, because the qualifications for VP are identical to those for President.

Suppose a one-term President ran for VP. He would be eligible to serve another four-year term if the President dropped dead on Inauguration Day. Or, he could serve less than half of someone else’s term, and run for one more term of his own.


96 posted on 02/15/2016 9:00:07 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
I agree but with it not spelled out, no precedent and a 6-3 dem majority with 3 soetoro appointees?

Just a mental exercise...but...

97 posted on 02/15/2016 9:13:43 PM PST by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

But it IS spelled out.

A person who is not qualified to be elected President is not qualified to be elected VP. That’s what the Constitution says.

Thus: Having completed two elected terms as POTUS, Soetoro is not eligible to the office of POTUS. Therefore, he is not eligible to the office of VP.

Precedent has nothing to do with it. Our Constitution does not take account of “precedent.”


98 posted on 02/15/2016 9:30:35 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Mames sense. Thanks.


99 posted on 02/15/2016 9:45:18 PM PST by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

MAKES sense. Thanks.


100 posted on 02/15/2016 9:46:18 PM PST by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson