Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau

Remember, eminent domain cases for these private endeavors only comes into play when people refuse an offer of payment.

Of course it is - it is far less complicated for developers to buy from a willing seller. Faster, fewer legal fees, less controversial, etc.

But that doesn’t make it OK. Property owners have every right to refuse an offer of payment. The government does not have the right to then take it from the unwilling property owner and hand it to the private developer. (Or should not, at least - Scalia was right about Kelo when he lumped it with Dred Scott and Korematsu as among the worst Supreme Court decisions ever)


83 posted on 02/14/2016 3:30:58 PM PST by ojeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ojeffers
I am that property owner


84 posted on 02/14/2016 3:57:27 PM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: ojeffers
When the railroad came through our town about 1875....only half of the folks wanted to sell....not matter....and there was no dickering....the amount was set...and they got what they got. 100's of people were involved. Do you think that was right?

These cases are so few and far between....it's really not such a big deal compared to what the government pulls....damn owl, stupid frog, wetlands...

85 posted on 02/14/2016 4:35:38 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson