Posted on 02/11/2016 7:29:05 PM PST by Kaslin
This is a no-brainer for Cruz, who came out hard against drafting women last week, but it’s interesting coming from Rubio after he declared himself in favor at the last debate. You can read his motives here as charitably or uncharitably as you like. Charitably: He’s striking a blow for legislative power at the executive’s and judiciary’s expense, a welcome corrective in an age of growing presidential power and judicial social engineering. Uncharitably: He realized belatedly that “let’s draft your daughters” isn’t a sentiment that’ll play well in a Republican primary, especially among the social conservatives he’s trying to win, so he’s backtracking from what he said at the debate to the extent that he can.
Rubio knows Cruz is preparing a roundhouse for him on this topic at the next debate on Saturday night, so here’s his attempt to clinch:
Though Rubio made clear in last Saturday's Republican debate that he supports opening up the draft to women, Alex Burgos, the Senator's spokesman, affirmed his support for leaving that decision up to the legislative branch. "Senator Rubio agrees with Senator Lee that Congress needs to determine the future of the Selective Service system and is working on legislation to codify that role and plans to support it," Burgos said.
Cruz has stated on the campaign trail that he would ardently oppose any attempt to change the current law. "The idea that we would draft our daughters to forcibly bring them into the military and put them in close combat, I think, is wrong. It is immoral," he told a New Hampshire audience on Sunday.
Lee's legislation is an attempt to preempt a scenario in which the Supreme Court takes up another challenge to the selective-service law and decides to "rewrite it like they did for Obamacare," says Conn Carroll, the Utah Senator's spokesman.
Why do we need a bill like this? Because the rationale underlying an old Supreme Court precedent upholding an all-male draft has weakened:
The Supreme Court upheld the all-male draft in 1981, finding that women could be excluded because they would not be called to fill critical combat positions during a war. But since the Pentagon began full integration of women that rationale might no longer be valid.
Marine Commandant Gen. Robert Neller and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley testified to the Senate this month that they believe the exemption should be ended.
That’s one reason Rubio gambled on supporting drafting women at the debate. He’s got cover from the military itself for his position, and he’ll surely use it when Cruz comes after him. Another reason is that the polling on this issue isn’t quite as lopsided as you might think if Rasmussen’s new data is accurate:
The poll found that 52 percent of women oppose requiring women to register, while 38 percent favor it and 10 percent are undecided.
Sixty-one percent of male respondents favored requiring that women register.
Overall, the split was more even, with 49 percent supporting and 44 percent opposing.
Most Republicans, 53 percent, said they oppose making women register for the draft, while 49 percent of Democrats said they favor it.
Republicans lean against it but not overwhelmingly, and there may be room for a shift given that the GOP skews male and men support including women in the draft. Even if this issue costs Rubio a tiny bit in the primaries, though, he’s always been touted as the candidate Republicans should ideally want for the general election and that’s how he seemed to be thinking in his debate answer — towards the general election. (It’s hard to remember now, after the debate malfunction heard ’round the world, but prediction markets had Rubio as the favorite for the nomination last weekend.) The “should we draft women?” question reeks of a wedge issue being used by the media to force Republicans to choose between their primary audience, which opposes the idea, and the general electorate, which leans in favor. According to another poll taken three years ago, 59 percent of Americans support including women in the draft. Rubio is trying to stay on that side of the issue to deny Hillary another easy bit of “war on women” demagoguery about paternalism in the general election campaign. Cruz, whose brand rests on proving that he’s the most solid conservative in the race, is less worried about that than about the opportunity to show Republican voters that he’s further right than Rubio on yet another issue.
Why not a compromise: Make women eligible for the draft on the stipulation that their numbers will be called only when the population of draft-eligible males is exhausted? The idea of the draft coming back is fanciful to begin with; might as well just add an extra layer of nonsense by imagining a national emergency so dire that we run through tens of millions of young and middle-aged men in grappling with it. Exit question for con-law junkies: What good will a bill like this do if SCOTUS finds that gender discrimination in the draft violates equal protection? Isn’t it just a political talking point being handed by Lee to his friends Rubio and Cruz?
This will be a sleeper issue, once it hits the average person who is knowledgeable about the nature of the current military, introducing their daughters into this system is not a good thing.
While they are at it, maybe they can remove the dufusses at the Pentagon who put them in combat positions.
There was a “bit” on SNL with Bill Murray saying the army shoudl be all women....and when they lose we could say “big deal you beat a bunch of women”
This was 1978-9 maybe....I understand it was a joke at the time....but these days what was once an unthinkable situation reinforced by humor has become real.
THe idea of putting women on foxholes is that the leftards don’t ever want to fight another war. This is how the plan on doing it. The public outrage about their daughters coming home in body bags mutilated and defiled, by explosives and enemy combatants.
When Onambla and his band of sodomites are gone in 11 months we can set everything right again.
Every day it is another sick in the eye of white america.
Is an 18 year old American female’s life worth more than an 18 year old American male’s life?
I might vote for Cruz if he looked like Rubio.
NO- just kidding. I’d never vote on looks as some women do.
Donald’s my man all the way. (he’s not bad looking)
It may not sell well to Republicans, but I DEMAND the left support drafting women. They laid the groundwork. They established the premises. They have already approved it in essence with men who feel like women or women who feel like men. They demand voluntary combat roles for women. They decided sexual attraction was a non issue with homo men. They are the ones who claim there is no difference. SUPPORT THIS OR BACK OFF AND UNDO THE GARBAGE YOU HAVE PERPETRATED ON THE REST OF US.
Well, crap...you’ve convinced me with these pictures that women should be drafted. lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.