Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XEHRpa; Iron Munro

My point is that a candidates’ sex ought not be relevant in the consideration of that person as a candidate. It is not a qualification for office.


53 posted on 02/10/2016 2:21:32 PM PST by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: be-baw
My point is that a candidates' sex ought not be relevant in the consideration of that person as a candidate. It is not a qualification for office.

******************************

With all due respect, I don't agree. People make decisions based on all measure of criteria. It's what makes us human.

56 posted on 02/10/2016 2:27:03 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: be-baw

>>> My point is that a candidate’s sex ought not be relevant in the consideration of that person as a candidate. It is not a qualification for office.

I was just pulling your leg with my snide reply. But seriously, we see how far MLK’s dream of considering not the color of skin, but the content of character, has come... in the negative direction. We’ve basically become a reverse apartheid country. Can we expect any better with gender? Hardly, if that freak Jenner is any indication.


68 posted on 02/10/2016 6:53:29 PM PST by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson