She was a “professional female”; not that she was a competent executive or had any professional accomplishments, but a token “female”. She was involved with a lot of “girl-power” crap that pressured companies to advance tokens instead of qualified “privileged” men.
As opposed to all the professional male politicians running in the Republican primary who have no professional accomplishments ? Perhaps we should choose the only one with military experience ?
I like who I like, and do not like who I don't like; the debates bring that out; it is visceral has nothing to do with the policy they advocate. It is how they present themselves.
Like: Fiorina, Trump, Rubio, Christie, Huckabee
Dislike: Cruz, Bush, Paul, Santorum
Neutral: Kasich, Carson, Gilmore