Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck

Yeah that could be a problem. The line between misfeasance and malfeasance is rather stark and if you can’t prove what side the error was on best not to make accusations.


18 posted on 02/10/2016 11:35:00 AM PST by discostu (This is a different kind of flying... all together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: discostu; HiTech RedNeck

If Starbucks were audited based on this recorded data, would they be able to claim it was an innocent mistake, or would they be fined?

I’m not finding much sympathy for a woman who should have known she was inadequate to the job. It’s not like she was diagnosed after she started.

The company is getting shafted at both ends. They are liable if she screws up (and not making sure her dyslexia doesn’t foul the record is *not* an innocent mistake). And they are liable if they hold her liable.

Falsifying the record, to my understanding, is the appropriate name for submitting a record as true data, when one is not certain that the data is correct.


38 posted on 02/10/2016 11:53:26 AM PST by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson