Rush Limbaugh Show,M-F,12NOONPM-3PM,EST,WOR AM,February 9,2016

The EIB Network ^ | February 9, 2016 | Rush Limbaugh

[altura]

But you failed to answer my question about Trump and his lack of real respect for women.

[caww]

I thought it hit the right “tone” lolol

[patriotgal1787]

And the lengths you go to knock Trump. Wow.

[TornadoAlley3]

Because it was said about Cruz. Because race is between Trump and Cruz. If he had said it about Jeb, and was not leading Cruz in polls, no one would care.

[Sensei Ern]

Trump reminds me a lot of Lyndon Johnson. Brash, foul-mouthed populous.

[navymom1]

Completely agree.

[caww]

It doesn’t take any length at all to knock Trump......he makes himself a very easy target....he has no leash on his tongue.

[altura]

Not really. It’s easy to point out Trump’s flaws. They are many and obvious.

But I will vote for him if he wins. I won’t be happy about it, but I’ll do it.

[jennychase]

Mr Rush Sandra Fluck is preaching today.

[Freedom56v2]

Foul mouthed?

Definition of pussy as per Webster

plural pus·sies

slang
: a weak or cowardly man or boy : wimp, sissy

Origin of pussy
short for pussycat
First Known Use: circa 1942

[Freedom56v2]

Not sure about that.

Sadly I have a good friend who only listens to Faux and Rush for their news....Guess who they like?

They don’t like the way Trump talks (thanks Kelly) and they are for Rubio....Wonder why.

[altura]

You know perfectly well that the word is never used in polite society to indicate a coward.

But then , we’re not talking about polite society, are we?

[lodi90]

“It’s not the word. The word is symbolic of the nature of the man. He’s a crude guy. He doesn’t respect women as people. I really believe that. He loves foreign women who are generally more subservient to men.”

But you failed to answer my question about Trump and his lack of real respect for women.

---

Why are you insulting foreign born women in this thread? You don’t sound very “respectful” of women to me. In fact, you sound like “do as I say not as I do” Democrat. Are you one by chance?

[LS]

So he voted for Corker and TPP because he was amending the Gang of Eight?

[Daffynition]

Well, that's your opinion.

I just happen to think that there are more vital things to worry about .... like defeating any Dem that gets the nomination. This Couintry can't keep going in this direction.

[Freedom56v2]

No and outside of church, we certainly don’t live in polite society—and I have seen plenty of examples in politics (by ALL candidates—Moron, Jerk, etc....Oh, and this morning I saw this thread :

Cruz Campaign Responds to Donald Trump: ‘Lets Not Forget Who Whipped Who in Iowa’
(Cruz’s Communications Director responded on Twitter by saying that Trump is, “turning the campaign into the latest episode of a reality show but let’s not forget who whipped who in Iowa.”)

Given what he was responding to, I think I should be outraged....I “do know very well what he meant”..and it was crude—there is no alternative definition for “p-whipped” is there?

You know, when Cruz campaign did that sketchy Election Violation mailer, sent the sketchy matching check mailer (which I personally received BTW), and did the sketchy text & voicemails about Carson leaving the race, all the Cruz people were saying, oh it is politics, it is not illegal, etc. It is much ado about nothing. Carson needs to get tough if he wants to play in big leagues, etc....One Cruz fan here actually posted how great it was that Cruz attacks the wounded (Carson) because if Cruz will attack one of our own, look what he will do the enemy” I can find the post if you wish....

So whatever actions or comments made by Cruz are OK, yet this word should not be used in a polite society??! Give me a break!! One word has everyone in an uproar. We do live in a very nasty society don’t we.

Half the people on FR may agree with you but I don’t.

And I saw the use of the word and I did not go into the gutter—I thought it meant what it was directed to mean—a coward a wimp. The definition is not archaic. It is in use since 1947 and applies.

I suggest that you might open the dictionary.
*

[Daffynition]

WHOA!

You just insulted my Swamp Yankee father's decision to marry a *foreign woman*, my mother.

You are completely off the rails.

Good luck with that.

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Funny, I thought Cruz was an open borders guy who voted for the Iran Deal and TPP.

Wait, he did.”

LOL

[Yosemitest]

FOLLOW THE LINKS !

It's always best to get the information from the ORIGINAL SOURCE.

Now let's really take a close look at HOW the Trans-Pacific Partnership was passed. (It took me a long time to track it down.)

Under The Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, 2015 is a small block index you'll find 2 Legislation.
There you'll find Legislation timelines and under that heading you'll read
• June 24, 2015: The Senate voted in favor of stand-alone TPA legislation ATTACHED TO HR 2146 - Defending Public Safety Employees' Retirement Act by a vote of 60-38.^[41]

Now look at HOW TED CRUZ VOTED on THAT VOTE.

Cruz (R-TX), Nay

TED CRUZ
voted
AGAINST TPP ! TPP, the Trans Pacific Partnership, is actually the name of the Organization that the legislation called TPA authorized.
What everyone is looking for is the vote on "FAST TRACK" !
Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy

Summary
Legislation to reauthorize Trade Promotion Authority (“TPA”), sometimes called "fast track," was introduced as the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 (TPA- 2015; H.R. 1890/S. 995) on April 16, 2015.
The legislation was reported by the Senate Finance Committee on April 22, 2015, and by the House Ways and Means Committee the next day.
TPA, as incorporated into H.R. 1314 by substitute amendment, passed the Senate on May 22 by a vote of 62-37.
In the House of Representatives, the measure was voted on under a procedure known as "division of the question," which requires separate votes on each component, but approval of both to pass.
Voting on June 12, TPA (Title I) passed by a vote of 219-211, but TAA (Title II) was defeated 126-302.
A motion to reconsider that vote was laid by Speaker Boehner shortly after that vote. ...

Now let's look at ALL of TED CRUZ's votes on the matter.

• April 22, 2015: The Senate Finance Committee approved S. 995: Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 by a vote of 20-6.
  TED CRUZ is NOT on that Committee .
  
  
• May 12, 2015: The United States Senate voted against a motion to proceed to the trade bill by a vote of 52-45.
  TED CRUZ (R-TX), Yea
  
  
• June 24, 2015: The Senate voted in favor of stand-alone TPA legislation ATTACHED TO HR 2146 - Defending Public Safety Employees' Retirement Act by a vote of 60-38.^[41]

Now look at HOW TED CRUZ VOTED on THAT VOTE.

Cruz (R-TX), Nay

So ... On the FINAL BILL,
the Bill with ALL the CHANGES,
TED CRUZ
voted
AGAINST TPP !
FOLLOW THE LINKS !

It's always best to get the information from the ORIGINAL SOURCE.

[unsycophant]

I KNOW!! !!!