That's a real interesting point. If there are no transcripts, no tapes, no photos, one can only assume one of two things (1) they didn't happen (2)not one person who was at any of her speeches has a record of it.
Is it criminal if your hypothesis is correct?
Is there anything that the Clintons have done in the last 30 years that has not involved some form of criminality or corruption?
Can you name for me any action they have taken that has not had a direct benefit to themselves first, last and always?
With the above questions as a baseline, where do you think Killery's speechifying comes in on that paradigm? Of course it was criminal...it was a bribe for favorable action down the road.
I would argue that Killery can't even take a dump without committing some sort of crime. Criminality is the very essence of her being.