Megyn Kelly Defends Maddow: ‘What’s the Harm’ in Her Moderating a Debate?

Mediate ^ | 02/05/15 | Josh Feldman

[servo1969]

Okay then. The next Dem debate should be include moderators Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin. What’s the harm? Oh, that’s right. The DNC isn’t as stupid as the GOP.

[SaveFerris]

I think you’re spot on.

[Gaffer]

What’s the harm of showing your a$$ off (literally in a magazine and figuratively as a debate moderator)?

[Gaffer]

Yep. That’s pretty much about it in a nutshell.

[Iron Munro]

You do know that "feminine" is only allowed for males and females have to look like dikes/jocks-for the children's proper Marxist utopia where boys are girls and there is no such allowed words as mother and father, wife or husband.

Got to blur the lines for children....

Very nice summary of an alarming cultural shift.

[Joe Boucher]

It just seems a little odd that when the debate is over, a moderator who is supposed to be impartial goes over and slips their tongue in Hillary’s mouth.

[Vision]

The world does not have time to educate megyn on how to be a grown-up.

[SaraJohnson]

Megs has a crush on Rachel.