I just finished listening to Jon Rappoport and John B Wells talk on Caravan to Midnight, and Jon Rappoport said the logic is no longer taught in public schools and colleges and universities. What is taught is the proper attitude to take on any given issue. So recognizing that using logic to explain how the world works has its risks, here goes.
Kurt Goedel’s Incompleteness Proof for the mathematical systems described in Russell’s and Whitehead’s “Principia Mathematica”, shows, logically that we can not develop a complete scientific theory of the world from inside the world. This confirms several statements in the Bible about the limits of human minds.
All the scientific theories that can be formulated from observing our world are “differential theories”. They tell how things change under certain conditions, but not how things are under any condition. So we have equations such as, E=MC^2, E=IR, and F=MA.
In order for the world to be held together, the Creator of the Universe has to have set up and maintained boundary conditions for the world. The only way for us to find out what the boundary conditions of the world are, and how they work, is for the creator of the world to tell us, directly, what we need to know and to do.
If one compares the Holy Scriptures, in as close to the original languages that we have, to what has happened in human history, it is clear that Elohim has a Plan for the universe, that we, amazingly, are an important part of that plan, and that, while we have individual choice, YHWH’s Plan will be accomplished as He engraved it in the fabric of His Universe.
So when the Supreme Court started banning God and the Bible from the public square, they banned the only source of true “science” that is available. The thing that should be noted is that the Bible predicts that this will happen and the consequences are predicted to be among the ones Saturbray cites in this article.
Well said!