Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki
So we spent how many millions to adapt a pretty good anti-aircraft missile to a so-so anti-ship missile?

While I recognize that an anti-ship capability is needed for surface ships, I'm not convinced that this makes any real improvement over existing capabilities. Except in rare circumstances, surface ships are not the go-to for anti-ship action. Aircraft and submarines remain the primary defenses against hostile actions by seaborne forces. Except for amphibious operations, surface ships exist to protect the carriers form hostile aircraft and submarines.

Once again, the pentagon seems obsessed to spend money on unneeded or unwanted weapons systems that “do everything sorta” while ignoring the real threats, or the need to update our core defense systems.

8 posted on 02/05/2016 10:23:20 AM PST by nuke_road_warrior (Making the world safe for nuclear power for over 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nuke_road_warrior

I agree that a Harpoon is a better ship killer.

The SM-6 will have a range of appx 200 nautical miles 70 miles or so more than Next Gen Harpoon

If the add on cost to the SM-6 is low enough it will give Aegis Class ships a bit more flexibility. With the smaller force we have on the water flexibility is a very good thing.

It is odd that so many people seem in love with hyper-supersonic anti ship missiles and then seem to not want to use SM as a supersonic ASM with dual role.

Both US and USSR have done this before of course Terrier,Tarter,Talos and Soviet Sunburn all had surface to surface option.

As for the warhead a unlike an aircraft there is a very good chance that the missile body will strike a surface target after or as the warhead detonates. The KE will be a nice add on.


9 posted on 02/05/2016 10:47:37 AM PST by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: nuke_road_warrior
One thing most people may not realize that nearly every navy now has ship killers, some only work for a few thousand yards, some several miles and some many 10’s of miles. The only way to own the sea around you is kill threats within strike distance, 200 miles is pretty a pretty good strike distance, likely farther than even high masted radar can see. Ship board armor is mostly on the hull, the deck is not that hard and superstructure even less hardened on the top. Coming straight down at 3 times the speed of sound will do serious damage even without a warhead. I would expect something that fast to go through all the superstructure to the hull, if it hits fuel, explosives or steam it is all over.
13 posted on 02/05/2016 11:07:57 AM PST by JAKraig (my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson