Posted on 02/04/2016 7:52:23 PM PST by 867V309
Senator Ted Cruz entire campaign, much like the credibility of Mark Levin, is built around his claim as âthe most consistent conservativeâ.
The topic is âbirthright citizenshipâ:
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
He evolved on the issue.
It really doesn't matter. At this point it appears that they are both self destructing.
We need to send Sundance and Leon Wolf to Thunderdome.
And let neither of them leave.
IRREFUTABLE AUTHORITY HAS SPOKEN
(Oct. 18, 2009) The Post & Email has in several articles mentioned that the Supreme Court of the United States has given the definition of what a ânatural born citizenâ is. Since being a natural born citizen is an objective qualification and requirement of office for the U.S. President (and VP), it is important for all U.S. Citizens to understand what this term means.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/
Is this guy for real? He is as much of a constitutional scholar and Barack Hussein Obama is a constitutional scholar. ‘Birthright’ citizenship is a feudal concept derived from a king’s prerogative to make subject to himself, all those born within his dominions, so remind me, when did our nation revert back to having a king as sovereign? Just when did this happen? Obama is not president but ‘king’? No wonder he acts like he does! And now natural born Canadian Ted Cruz is seeking to set himself up our next king!
WOW folks, we do have a king according to Ted Cruz’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment! WOW!!!
Talking or getting close to him could be dangerous.
So sayeth the natural born Canadian.
Yes, it’s too bad the we do not have a real constitutionalist to vote for. Nope, as usual, we are left to choose from the best looking scrap in the dumpster
Naw, Comacho.
No evolution here. He said he wants to end birthright citizenship. He didn’t say the Constitution doesn’t allow it. It will take a constitutional amendment to end it which he supports.
Is Cruz talking about Birthright Citizenship or anchor babies? Two different things
Daniel 4:17
This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men
Why would you expect better?
Rubio is winning nothing. absolutely nothing. He is a lying amnesty rino. He will never get the nomination of this party. I dont think he will win a single primary. Tell us the one he will absolutely win? Just one.
Sundance did manage a Publix once, so I guess he has cred.
In the video he never said he was for birthright citizenship. He said it would be hard to argue against it to the Supreme Court and it would be more effective to secure the border. It’s disingenuous to imply that he was for birthright citizenship and now he is against it. He didn’t change his position. He has always been against it.
Can we get ConservativeNuthouse articles banned from this site? RightScoop is banned and the Nuthouse is far more useless. This seems like a stealth DNC propaganda outlet.
What is Rubio;s position on this?
What is trumps position on this?
What is Katich’s position on this?
What is Carson’s position on this?
Cruz has a strong position on this and Texas — the state he represents has enacted powerful restrictions on this here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.