None of these aides broke the law then decided to run for President. If true, they should be prosecute just as Hillary should be
Justify bad behavior with other bad behavior; typical RAT trick.
Actually Colin Powell wrote about this in his book. Except he and Condi did not use personal unsecure SERVERS!!! All these e-mails were also turned over as required by law.
have to go back to find out that “everybody” does it excuse....
I’d like to see all 3 of them do the perp walk.
Before the law was changed. And when cyber security was not a major focus or problem.
There she goes again, hiding behind the black folks.
“Ahh am Jesss lakk youu, and Ahh am no wheres’ ta’rred!!”
“Everybody does it.”
OK, in Democrat speak, it means 3 wrongs make it right! All is forgiven, now move on.
I am sure it MSNBC digs deep enough, they will find that both Thomas Jefferson and John Adams used personal email while Secretary of State.
Hmmmmmm ..?? Does anybody else get the point that the two people in this article are from the GW Bush admin.
Geeeee .. it seems we’re still bashing Bush .. good grief.
Really? Allow me to parse through this statement a bit--
Has NBC News also learned who sent this classified information? What was the specific classification? Was it considered Confidential, Secret or Top Secret, and did it pertain to national security? Who exactly, sent this information to the former Secretaries? Were they ordered to send it to them on a non-secure server? If so, who gave that order? Why do these government e-mail systems permit users to share e-mail outside of secure government domains anyway? It would be so easy to transpose a character or a domain suffix, and send classified material anywhere.
Regardless, the media is simply attempting to circle the wagons for Clinton with stories like this. And if Powell and Rice were guilty of such acts, they too, should be prosecuted.
This is being done to slow down the investigation - Since we now have to look into the activities of these other individuals, we cannot make any recommendations regarding Mrs. Clinton until the entire investigation is completed (well after the November election.)
This is being done to slow down the investigation - Since we now have to look into the activities of these other individuals, we cannot make any recommendations regarding Mrs. Clinton until the entire investigation is completed (well after the November election.)
Well that settles it - we should just let this go. Heck, others do it so that makes it okay, right? o.O
So, if I rob a bank, do you think the judge will throw the case out if I point out that other people before me have also robbed banks?
So, if I rob a bank, do you think the judge will throw the case out if I point out that other people before me have also robbed banks?