Posted on 02/02/2016 2:13:26 PM PST by wagglebee
Obviously, the employer is not a Somalian, or the judge would have peed his pants instead.
I never talk like this on the board but the under 30 crowd maybe even the 40 crowd has completely succumbed to evil in the media and online. Why would I be shocked when God takes out his wrath? that guy from Russia was right. America has gone mad and it wants to take the whole world with it
I speak from some experience.
Many years ago I was a Branch Manager/Stock Broker and we had any number of unwarranted claims made by idiot clients because they lost money. These claims went to binding arbitration and were settled behind closed doors. Sometime in the early 1990’s there was some ruling that allowed these arbitration hearings and settlements to become public. The lawyers had a field day. The number of fallacious claims went through the roof and as a result it severely hampered business and firms found it cheaper to settle a claim than fight.
I actually advised my firm to settle a $400,000 claim for $35,000 even though the client had no real basis. He claimed that he lost this money because we allowed him to place trades while he was stoned on drugs and we supposedly knew he was stoned.
Even in hindsight, I can’t say it was wrong to settle.
Yeah. I doubt the 35K lasted long at that rate.
**************************
I'm not sure that's required. Consider Bruce Jenner.
So what happens when the women employed there start suing for sexual harassment by the employer, for letting men go in their facilities???
Welcome to a fundamentally transformed America.
Spit.
Women are now lower on the liberal pyramid of “victimhood”. If they complain, they’ll just be told to shut up because they’re “transphobic”.
The companies will probably settle these, too. Lose lose.
Absolutely SICK. I don’t care if this Y chromosome bearer calls themselves Pollyanna. I am NOT sharing a bathroom with it. Who’s to say that “on Tuesday, it must be boy day” and “on Wednesday, I’m a little goil”? Yuck.
The next time I’m in the market for a car, I’m going to have to question whether I want to drive something built by a country that is this stupid. Americans will answer this in November.
Years ago, the company I worked at had a small storage room that shared the door with the women’s bathroom. The bathroom had no separate door off the storage room but it did have stalls. One day, I was in the storage room doing something and our idiot receptionist comes in and proceeds into the women’s room where she starts to go. I told her that she should have just a touch of class and then I left. I guess I could get sued for something or other now. huh?
Judge, this guy who thinks he wants to be a woman, and the EEOC are sick.
I’d like to use the shitter in the Oval Office...
Also note that, regardless what FDRs thug justices wanted everybody to believe about the scope of Congresss Commerce Clause powers (1.8.3), a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate INTRAstate commerce.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” - Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Also note that regardless what Obamas activist justices want everybody to believe about Obamacare, previous generations of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for Intrastate healthcare purposes. This is evidenced by the excerpts below.
And since this issue concerns health insurance, note the fourth entry in the list below from Paul v. Virginia. In that case state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that regulating insurance is not within the scope of Congresss Commerce Clause powers (1.8.3), regardless if the parties negotiating the insurance policy are domiciled in different states.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress. [emphases added]” - Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” - Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”Inspection laws, quarantine laws, health laws of every description [emphasis added], as well as laws for regulating the internal commerce of a state and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c., are component parts of this mass.” -Justice Barbour, New York v. Miln., 1837.
” 4. The issuing of a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce within the meaning of the latter of the two clauses, even though the parties be domiciled in different States, but is a simple contract [emphasis added] of indemnity against loss.” - Paul v. Virginia, 1869. (The corrupt feds have no Commerce Clause (1.8.3) power to regulate insurance.)
”Direct control of medical practice in the states is obviously [emphases added] beyond the power of Congress.” - Linder v. United States, 1925.
So the feds have no constitutional authority to stick their big noses into this issue imo.
And lets not put all the blame on the Obama Administration for the federal governments unconstitutional interference in 10th Amendment-protected state powers. More specifically, note that corrupt Congress has always had the power to stop lawless Obama dead in his tracks but has stubbornly refused to do so.
Remember in November !
When patriots elect Trump, Cruz, or whatever conservative they elect, they need to also elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will protect the states from federal government overreach.
Also, consider that such a Congress would probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.
The so-called “judge” has clearly lost his ability to judge.
He needs top be excommunicated from the bench. (Or what ever it's called)
No doubt.
The guy was nuts.
He would put 2 or 3 hundred grand on OEX options in one trade a few times a week.
And yes, I knew he was on drugs, everybody knew.
He made money and lost it just as fast.
All Unsolicited trades.
But when he blew up he found a lawyer and filed a claim.
impeached and convicted
And feminists who complained that a woman of the year shouldn’t have a penis were shut down as “transphobic”.
Ditto the complaints about the top earning female CEO being a man for most of his career.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.