Posted on 02/02/2016 2:13:26 PM PST by wagglebee
So, not only is the employer being punished for RESPECTING WOMEN'S PRIVACY, the taxpayers are paying to go to court over this depravity.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
the judge has outlived his term
Disgusting. Drag queens have more rights than anyone now. They don’t even need to work, just sue people for a living.
if I was working for that employer I would sue that male for demanding he use the women’s bathroom...
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
It’s getting to the point where folks like Mr. Austin need a visit from Guido and Vinny.
Didn’t we all suspect that this is what would happen?
If he still has man parts, he needs to be the bathroom that is designed to accommodates man parts.
Exactly. Always loved Daffy. :)
Deluxe also refused to change his name to “Britney” on company records, because he had not undergone cosmetic surgery to make himself appear female.
_______________________________________________
No because he had not changed it legally...
the employer does not have to doctor records just on the employees say so...
If the guy had gone to court and changed it legally to Iamaqueer Mann or Ima Mann then the employer would have to change the records and give the employee new ID name tags etc...
The women at that company ought to walk out. The recidivism rate for “transgender” people is surprisingly high. This guy might very well “change back”, and then all those women will have to live with a heterosexual man they aren’t married to knowing intimate information about them.
Yes, it puts the company owner between a rock and a hard place, but the company will likely end up having to shut down anyway after the judgement and bad publicity; they might as well be able to blame the guy directly rather than some impersonal court decision.
Companies that settle these suits are contributing to the problem and it will only increase the number of law suits.
I understand very well that in many cases it comes down to the simple math that drives these settlements.
It is becoming extortion.
He WILL age like a man, receding hairline or friar tuck bald top, lots of hair will grow in his nose and eyebrows. He'll get the MALE pot belly.
Taking his genetalia away isn't going to grow him a uterus.
HE will ever be SHE. HE will also have to face his Maker someday and explain why he listened to Satan about his gender.
YES.
So if a worker comes in one day, says he’s now to be called Fido, and sets up a fire hydrant, the EEOC will be there to sue anyone who says no?
I realize that these settlements are all about cost rationalizations - it would cost hundreds of thousands more to defend against the lawsuit, and already cost tens of thousands to get to this point.
But catering to someone’s psychotic fantasy isn’t a long term solution.
He probable knows the best bathroom in every part of the city and would not be denied.
This so-called judge is sicker than Austin.
The judge deserves the rope more than the mental case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.