My question is this. After Cruz spread the lie about Carson — CRUZ knowing that it wasn’t true and speakers were denied speaking time “ because your candidate has withdrawn” and voters left or voted for someone else — how many thousands of Carson votes fraudulently diverted? I think this will be remembered a long time with the flier that told old people they were in VIOLATION of the voting laws!! Even after Mrs Carson was yelling that he has “NOT WITHDRAWN” at her caucus— they went ahead. Did you know that Cruz had 12,000 vote from out of state?
I heard Dr. Carson on hannity radio. HE DID NOT ACCEPT THIS PARSED “Apology” . But he did take it as an admission of “sleezy politics”. Cruz is finished before the Courts got to his being “FOREIGN BORN”.
It doesn't appear to me that Cruz and his staffers knew the CNN info was erroneous until some time after they acted on the info. Yet you're spinning it into something it's not. Why? Ask yourself that. And no, "ask yourself that" does not mean "search yourself for justification for your own apparent mis-characterization of events"...
The (later discovered to be erroneous) CNN info didn't come out until part-way through the caucus proceedings in the first place, right? We're talking only a matter of hours here, and right in the thick of things, while much else was taking place too.
Or-- you could provide backing link for the primary assertion you made that I highlighted, above.
What's it going to be?
Are you going to continue doing the GOPe's and DNC's dirty work for them, in attempting to take Cruz out?
Doing so sullies all the rest of the contenders, somewhat by default. One of those will be facing whoever the eventual Democrat Party nominee it will be.
Please. Don't be so dead set against Cruz that you end up shooting even Trump in the foot-ses.
Make one leading Republican nominee look bad, and they all take a hit. And Trunp ain't no angel, in case you haven't noticed. But he did have some quite gracious things to say about coming in second place in the Iowa caucus. I'll gladly hand him that (even though I heard only a small part of it on the radio earlier today, he sounded good).
It doesn't appear to me that Cruz and his staffers knew the CNN info was erroneous until some time after they acted on the info. Yet you're spinning it into something it's not. Why? Ask yourself that. And no, "ask yourself that" does not mean "search yourself for justification for your own apparent mis-characterization of events"...
The (later discovered to be erroneous) CNN info didn't come out until part-way through the caucus proceedings in the first place, right? We're talking only a matter of hours here, and right in the thick of things, while much else was taking place too.
Or-- you could provide backing link for the primary assertion you made that I highlighted, above.
What's it going to be?
Are you going to continue doing the GOPe's and DNC's dirty work for them, in attempting to take Cruz out?
Doing so sullies all the rest of the contenders, somewhat by default. One of those will be facing whoever the eventual Democrat Party nominee it will be.
Please. Don't be so dead set against Cruz that you end up shooting even Trump in the foot-ses.
Make one leading Republican nominee look bad, and they all take a hit. And Trunp ain't no angel, in case you haven't noticed. But he did have some quite gracious things to say about coming in second place in the Iowa caucus. I'll gladly hand him that (even though I heard only a small part of it on the radio earlier today, he sounded good).