It doesn't appear to me that Cruz and his staffers knew the CNN info was erroneous until some time after they acted on the info. Yet you're spinning it into something it's not. Why? Ask yourself that. And no, "ask yourself that" does not mean "search yourself for justification for your own apparent mis-characterization of events"...
The (later discovered to be erroneous) CNN info didn't come out until part-way through the caucus proceedings in the first place, right? We're talking only a matter of hours here, and right in the thick of things, while much else was taking place too.
Or-- you could provide backing link for the primary assertion you made that I highlighted, above.
What's it going to be?
Are you going to continue doing the GOPe's and DNC's dirty work for them, in attempting to take Cruz out?
Doing so sullies all the rest of the contenders, somewhat by default. One of those will be facing whoever the eventual Democrat Party nominee it will be.
Please. Don't be so dead set against Cruz that you end up shooting even Trump in the foot-ses.
Make one leading Republican nominee look bad, and they all take a hit. And Trunp ain't no angel, in case you haven't noticed. But he did have some quite gracious things to say about coming in second place in the Iowa caucus. I'll gladly hand him that (even though I heard only a small part of it on the radio earlier today, he sounded good).
The glitch, as it were, was all mine.