Posted on 02/02/2016 8:19:58 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Drank the Senate koolaid. Now what?
Establishment and fox all in for the amnesty pimp
Why do any of these people even acknowledge Hillary as a possible nominee? They should not even mention her name or if they do frame her as a criminal, someone to come under indictment, or that a dark cloud is descending upon her candidacy.
ahhhhhhh!
Cruz and Trump need to cease fire and squash this phony pipsqueak.
Idiot! Hillary will crush Rubio like a bug.
Graham will endorse soon, and so will the Governor.
Someone is going to need to take a swing at him, or the GOPe will be as good as back.
Disappointed in Tim...
we graduated from the same college...
Tim Scott is either stupid or sold out.
The real Rubio...a K St. Trojan Horse.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3391812/posts
Because that noise about her "possibly being indicted" is for entertainment purposes only. She's not going to face prosecution.
RUBIO wants the people’s votes. However, he barely voted to represent them in the senate.
Trip down memory lane:
According to GovTrack, an independent congressional monitor that tracks the voting records of all congressional offices in the Capitol, Rubio is consistently at the top end in terms of missed votes. In 2014, a year before he even announced his presidential campaign, Rubio was in the Top 15, missing 45 out of the 657 Senate votes taken that year — an abstention rate of 6.8%. His record has gotten exponentially worse this year: since January 2015, Rubio has missed an estimated 32% of the votes that the Senate has held (91 out 283 on record as of October 25). In fact, from July to September alone, he missed more than half (53.8 %), giving him the embarrassing distinction of having the second-worst voting attendance during that period.
One of these missed votes included the final passage of the 2016 National Defense Authorization Act — the legislation that authorizes programs and policy for the U.S. military and Defense Department for the coming fiscal year. In short, a man who is basing a good chunk of his presidential campaign on foreign policy and national security missed one of the most important national security votes Congress took this year.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-r-depetris/marco-rubios-pathetic-exc_b_8387300.html
Just damn, I did not think Scott was a Cheap Labor Express lackey.
Oh well.
I’m not voting for the ‘rube’ if he’s the last candidate in the race. Too young. Didn’t like his speech. I’m not voting for a guy who will open up the flood gates of illegal immigration so that we’ll forever have to promote candidates with a hyphen in their cultural designation. Don’t call me a racist. That’s just how I feel. Don’t change the makeup of my country for the benefit of the elites and then tell me the only way to get the vote of minority voters is to only promote minority candidates. Sheesh even as I type this, I can see how someone can misread it. Bottom line, Rubio wouldn’t be getting pushed forward unless he was a minority. I say he’s unqualified.
If that were true then it would be a very sad situation. In other words, we either get Hillary or Hillary Lite.
I swear, if the GOPe shoves another “electable” candidate like Rubio down our throats again, I am going to vote for Hillary (or maybe write in for Colonel West).
Indeed she will.
We are so screwed.
I agree. Rubio is the establishment.
Tim Scott is wrong. Cruz is the one who can defeat Hillary AND restore the constitution and rule of law. Rubio would also beat Hillary, but the corrupt D.C. Mafia woud still hold the power over the good people of America.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.