That's not true. Both Bush 43 (2000) and Barack Obama (2008) went on to win their parties' nomination and the presidency. Who is doing his research?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not a single candidate who has won both NH and Iowa has lost the nomination for his/her party.
2 posted on
01/30/2016 2:28:06 PM PST by
Politicalkiddo
("May God save the country, for it is obvious the people will not."- Millard Fillmore)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Trump says he believes he is going to win.
3 posted on
01/30/2016 2:28:43 PM PST by
Red Steel
(Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
To: 2ndDivisionVet
C’mon Donald, just call them stupid and move on
4 posted on
01/30/2016 2:28:49 PM PST by
almcbean
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Trump’s just doing what any prudent candidate would do with two days till the caucus - make sure your supporters don’t get complacent.
5 posted on
01/30/2016 2:28:52 PM PST by
mbrfl
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Only this quote had nothing to do with Iowa, other than that, its a very untrue propaganda.
7 posted on
01/30/2016 2:29:16 PM PST by
heights
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I have a bad feeling Rubio might win it. I hope I’m wrong.
8 posted on
01/30/2016 2:29:41 PM PST by
Theoria
(I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Donald is finally discovering what those of us who have been studying Cruz’s ground game knew all along!
We’re in it to win it...Ted Cruz 2016!
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Time magazine.
Nuff said.
11 posted on
01/30/2016 2:30:14 PM PST by
Jack Hammer
(uff said.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I saw the speech. He did say that. A good showing and popularity are worthless without winning the vote. All this work will have been a waste of his time, if he doesn’t win.
15 posted on
01/30/2016 2:31:20 PM PST by
Cboldt
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Donald Trump Starts to Consider an Iowa Loss
for CruzFixed it.
16 posted on
01/30/2016 2:31:23 PM PST by
DannyTN
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Time needs to stop calling itself a magazine. It is down to pamphlet size at this point.
18 posted on
01/30/2016 2:31:51 PM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Out of context but hey that’s the normal now.
21 posted on
01/30/2016 2:32:21 PM PST by
McGruff
(Boycott Fox News Channel. I am.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Time Magazine can be counted upon to push whatever the latest “Extablishment” progressive propaganda is-—I NEVER read this “pamphlet” anymore.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Wishful thinking at Time Magazine.
Even the loser Nate Silver now has Trump winning Iowa big time
This is when Nate had Trump losing Iowa up until a week ago.
Trump will win Iowa.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
He’s been using that “if we lose line” for months.
29 posted on
01/30/2016 2:35:08 PM PST by
exist
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Encouraging his people to keep working hard during the final two days before the caucus isn’t what I would call “considering losing”.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
..Iowa is its own animal. That is why it is so hard to poll...
35 posted on
01/30/2016 2:36:38 PM PST by
WalterSkinner
( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The writer is an idiot or liar.
This is typical ‘fire up the vote’ stuff.
And Trump, like Cruz, factored in the loss of Iowa at the beginning.
It’s not a big problem.
36 posted on
01/30/2016 2:36:38 PM PST by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Trump has said all along if he doesn’t win it’s a waste of time.
38 posted on
01/30/2016 2:38:02 PM PST by
Hugin
("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man St anding.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson