Why don’t you go ahead and explain why the letter mentions the neighbors for us and why the letter claims there will be a follow up letter? Why don’t you explain in clear detail the purpose of that since you claim there is no threat or intimidation intended. What was the exact purpose?? Go ahead, we’ll wait for your BS answer.
I know the direct marketing industry and know their practices. They would not send out an expensive mailing that violated the law, their profit and their very existence rides on avoiding such legal snafus on behalf of their clients, the political campaigns. They’re relying on information in the public domain that is made readily available by the states for exactly such use as this. So, they may send out another one? The first one broke no laws, a “reminder” won’t either. Do conservatives find it intrusive, perhaps to the point of anger? That seems to be the case, in this instance at least. Was it ill-advised of the Cruz campaign to authorize this? Looks like it was. That’s my answer, and you’re certainly free to call it BS if you want, but it’s clear that you’re running on emotion rather than facts.