I know the direct marketing industry and know their practices. They would not send out an expensive mailing that violated the law, their profit and their very existence rides on avoiding such legal snafus on behalf of their clients, the political campaigns. They’re relying on information in the public domain that is made readily available by the states for exactly such use as this. So, they may send out another one? The first one broke no laws, a “reminder” won’t either. Do conservatives find it intrusive, perhaps to the point of anger? That seems to be the case, in this instance at least. Was it ill-advised of the Cruz campaign to authorize this? Looks like it was. That’s my answer, and you’re certainly free to call it BS if you want, but it’s clear that you’re running on emotion rather than facts.
“They would not send out an expensive mailing that violated the law”
They do all the time. That isn’t much of an argument.