[Brooklyn Attitude]

“According to that picture, he would not have been reaching for his left shoulder to produce a weapon”.

So if he was a lefty he couldn’t have been reaching for a weapon and if he’s right handed he couldn’t have been reaching for a weapon. That’s pretty funny. For all we know he could have been wearing a shoulder holster on the left side.

[Smokin' Joe]

He could have been. Guys I know from Idaho have holster like pockets sewn into their coats to function like a shoulder holster, too. The question arises of whether he was armed or not, and whether he had already been shot at that point in the video and was reaching for the wound in a reflex motion.

There are plenty of shooters out there who could have intentionally hit him there and counted on that reflex in a no-audio video to appear like he was reaching for a weapon to justify killing him.

This was a set-up from the git-go, from lies about safe passage to a peaceful meeting, to the road block with drone overhead.

Someone was going to get killed over this to intimidate the masses.