I should have mentioned Hillary Clinton in the headline.
I thought this information was interesting, since the article talked a little about the secure networks.
And here was a breach of the network where a lot of info was stolen from Hillary’s State while, unbeknownst to the public, she was storing Classified info on her home-brew secret server, never intending for us to ever know she’d put national security at risk.
Just so she could keep her own personal secrets “top secret.”
I’d like to see polls on how much of the public believes she was up to no good with her private server.
Other than her name, what makes Clinton any different than Manning or Snowden? All broke the law.
Not that many, I'm afraid.
I just streamed segments from Fox, CBS, and NBC about the 22 Top Secret emails. Fox had Judge Napolitano explain that what's already publicly known proves that Mrs. Clinton committed Felonies.
But CBS and NBC were very dismissive about them claiming they don't prove anything. ABC, CNN, NYT, WP, etc. won't put much importance on the felonies either.
bump