Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump is right, says brave economist (You have to be brave to agree with Trump?)
MarketWatch ^ | 01/28/16 | Tom Bemis

Posted on 01/28/2016 11:55:58 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway

Donald Trump is right when he calls for high trade tariffs to protect American jobs, according to one brave economist. The Republican presidential candidate’s protectionist rhetoric has been playing well with voters heading into the primary season. But Trump has been attacked by economists and the media for violating the sacred belief that free trade is always a good thing, writes Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland. Morici argues that China hasn’t been playing fair, however, and says the artificially weak yuan has cost America hundreds of thousands of jobs. “Trump’s proposals for fixing trade — starting with China — address the salient issues of currency, trade barriers and subsidies,” Morici wrote on Newsmax. A recent academic study by three prominent labor-market economists found China’s entry to the global trading system 15 years ago has caused deep and lasting harm to Americans.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: economy; jobs; trade; trump; trumpwasright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: jwalsh07

No such lesson has been learned. The consumer is free to purchase a cheaper non-tariffed item. The tariff is not a tax for this reason.


41 posted on 01/28/2016 2:32:51 PM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RC one

OK Mr. Keynes.


42 posted on 01/28/2016 2:33:54 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Correction: The tariff is not a tax on the consumer for this reason.


43 posted on 01/28/2016 2:34:18 PM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
"Corporations do not and can not absorb costs and stay in business."

Sure they can. It depends on how much profit margin they have.

44 posted on 01/28/2016 2:34:20 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

A tariff on one bad actor doesn’t prevent the consumer from purchasing goods from another actor. The consumer has a plethora of options in the age of the global economy.


45 posted on 01/28/2016 2:37:22 PM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Whatever you say!


46 posted on 01/28/2016 2:53:03 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Globalist!


47 posted on 01/28/2016 2:53:33 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Free trade has ruined out industry, manufacturing and jobs!! We pay tariffs in China. They don’t pay here. This is going to change very soon.


48 posted on 01/28/2016 5:22:44 PM PST by WENDLE (Trump is not bought . He is no puppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE
We pay tariffs in China. They don't pay here.

You have no idea how tariffs work, do you?

49 posted on 01/28/2016 5:32:33 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

yes — Do you?


50 posted on 01/28/2016 5:35:47 PM PST by WENDLE (Trump is not bought . He is no puppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE
yes - Do you?

Looks like it. Tariffs are applied to imports and paid for by the country's consumers that buy the goods, since they are almost always passed along by the importer. We don't pay China's tariffs and they don't pay ours.

51 posted on 01/28/2016 5:44:05 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Not at all. That is where you are all screwed up. Tariffs are paid by the MANUFACTURER/ shippers!!!~ You need to rethink!!You have no clue. Did you just get out of college?

?


52 posted on 01/28/2016 8:09:13 PM PST by WENDLE (Trump is not bought . He is no puppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Nope. The tariffs are paid at the border. Do you deny that?


53 posted on 01/28/2016 8:26:33 PM PST by WENDLE (Trump is not bought . He is no puppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE
Not at all. That is where you are all screwed up. Tariffs are paid by the MANUFACTURER/ shippers!!!~

You really don't know what tariffs are. Tariffs are applied to imports. U.S. companies sell their goods to a local business and that tax is applied when the goods are landed. It's the importer that pays them and not the exporter.

54 posted on 01/29/2016 3:44:59 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE
Nope. The tariffs are paid at the border. Do you deny that?

Taxes are paid when the goods are landed in the country in question. I sell a widget to someone in China for a set price plus shipping. The widget is shipped to a warehouse in China and delivered to the person I sold it to. They pay the tariff at that time.

55 posted on 01/29/2016 3:47:13 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
For those with any intellectual curiosity Smoot Hawley has become the whipping boy of the Free Traitor™ cabal but in reality it had very little impact on the GD. What the poster wrote may be true that exports were reduced by 66%. But 66% of what dollar value?

At the time of passage the economy was measured in GNP not GDP and the USA did not rely on trade to keep its economy running. Trade was an after thought as the USA was virtually self sufficient in everything as the Nazis found out a little later on. The GNP is similar to GDP and the figure not adjusted for inflation is 90B. So how much of GDP did trade represent? The answer is that exports accounted for $4Billion dollars which was around 4% of the economy, a tiny amount of the economy.

So if Smoot Hawley reduced exports by 66% then the USA lost $3B or around 3% of GNP, tiny. A 3% loss in GNP is not even 1% per quarter. It is not good but had almost zero effect on worsening the economy.

56 posted on 01/29/2016 4:03:25 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
Tariffs would have to be on the order of 300% at a minimum to be effective against Chinese cost efficiency.

You are really mistaken. The amount of labor per manufactured (durable) item is a very small part of the retail price and averages around 6-8% and that is for domestically produced durable goods. For ChiCom made durable goods figure is around 2% per item pays for labor. A small tariff would balance that indifference. Maybe 10% tariff.

Free Trade theory is built on a mountain of lies and misinformation.

57 posted on 01/29/2016 4:10:44 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

You pay again when yo have to replace the poor quality ChiCom product every 2 years instead of every 5 years for the domestic model.


58 posted on 01/29/2016 4:12:32 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Do you have any conservative views?

Do you have any pro American views?

59 posted on 01/29/2016 4:14:29 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Free Traitors™ try to separate politics form international trade. That is like trying to separate politics form war. It cannot be done. Internationally trade and war are THE MOST POLITICAL ENDEAVORS OF ALL.


60 posted on 01/29/2016 4:21:13 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson