Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant
So your scenario is not plausible.

Then you have nothing to worry about. But I think you are wrong. I think Bloomberg would have a much better chance to win in states like NY, NJ, etc. He could run as a "moderate" progressive, painting Trump as a racist demagogue and painting Hillary/Bernie as socialists. Most NE Republicans tend to be more liberal and would oppose Trump in immigration; independents and Dems in those states that do not want to vote for Hillary might vote for Trump is there is not an alternative, but Bloomberg would give them that alternative.

60 posted on 01/27/2016 10:29:24 AM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative
Anyone on the Republican side who likes Bloomberg would vote for Trump and anyone on the Dem side who likes him would vote for Hillary or Sanders first. He brings nothing to the table for anyone in the northeast. And he is despised everywhere else (among people who have even heard of him).

Trump, on the other hand, attracts some Democrats in the Northeast, and doesn't repel any Republicans, except the country clubbers/Wall Street types.

I didn't say I was worried. I think Bloomberg, at best, would siphon off maybe 5-10 percent of the vote, and more would come from the Dem nominee than the Republican.

63 posted on 01/27/2016 12:58:14 PM PST by Defiant (RINOs are leaders of a party without voters. Trump/Cruz are leaders of voters without a party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson