To: The All Knowing All Seeing Oz
There are actually two witnesses.
You charge the police, you get shot. *shrug*
To: RIghtwardHo
You are making a conclusion based on two witnesses, either or both who may be intimately related to the Federal government. I want a video. Certainly there was one or more.
I shall reserve judgement until a vid is available.
22 posted on
01/27/2016 7:56:39 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(I'm an Islamophobe??? Well, good. When it comes to Islam, there's plenty to Phobe about.)
To: RIghtwardHo
One witness collaborated the story of the first who admitted he saw nothing, was too far away to see what happened, and only heard about what happened from someone still in police custody
27 posted on
01/27/2016 8:08:42 AM PST by
usmcobra
(Happiness is a belt fed weapon.)
To: RIghtwardHo
There may be two witnesses.
But we have yet to hear form them.
We only know what this guy claims they told him.
33 posted on
01/27/2016 8:37:37 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: RIghtwardHo
This situation has been building for quite some time.
Apparently the plans for resolution did not include non-lethal force as an initial response.
And you have no problem with that.
100 posted on
01/27/2016 6:02:42 PM PST by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson