Posted on 01/26/2016 2:43:15 PM PST by jazusamo
Not only should they send their recommendation to the AG, they should publish their findings. Chances are they will send up a recommendation to indict, but it will be quashed. We need to know. The public has a right to know.
Amen to that. There comes a time when these criminal acts have to be dealt with and that time is now being they haven’t already.
"The bureau does not waive its primacy in espionage cases," the intelligence source said, referring to USC 18 793 and 794. "The security investigation is now part and parcel with the criminal [public corruption] investigation." The source said both tracks are being pursued "vigorously" and there is a sense of "incredulity as to what is being discovered."
Nuff said.
There are obviously political considerations.
If the Obama administration feels they will have to indict HRC, then it would be logical to do it now, before she becomes the nominee. That would allow other electable candidates to enter the race and duke it out with Bernie.
If, on the other hand, the Obama administration wished to destroy the Democratic Party, they only have to wait about four or five months, and then indict her.
Absolutely, and there’s been several who say the FBI will publish or leak their findings if there’s no indictment, I pray that’s true.
I think they will time it so BO will be out of office and can’t pardon her. Hope so.
We, the US- are getting “clowned,” by these bastards.
I want her in jail nearly as much as I want Hillary.
It's a crime in itself that she is still running around free.
14 posts before some sanity...
The incessant ‘hitlery is going to jail’ FR tossage is just nuts. Has everyone forgotten the last 30 years?
Hitlery will go to jail the same day her oystermate goes to jail for being a 20 year MB operative.
one of the things I wonder is if Hillary had intelligence reports she should not have. some documents are so classified that there might be only a few people allowed to view the info. if Hillary has one of those documents and her name is not on the list of those allowed to see the documents I see a long jail sentence as a possibility.
What, exactly, is the point in running on a platform of putting your predecessor in jail? Suppose you do that, and suppose you win in November. Will you live to Inauguration Day? Will the sitting POTUS leave office peacefully?Bottom line: it is hard to discipline a president. It is dangerous to the Constitution to discipline a president or former president. Because of the precedent it establishes in favor of refusing to leave office.
Something takes place when you elect a person of principle and they go to Washington. It's like there is this place where they all go for orientation and they get scared to death, threatened, bribed wildly, or get brainwashed somehow? Perhaps a combination of all the above?
I've seen it too many times. Every time as a matter of fact. I'm not a James Trafficant fan by any stretch, but look at what they did to him for trying to swim against the crowded stream?
Ah, yes, I agree. Along with that character that deserted then was invited to meet the Jug-eared Jackass, both are treasonous.
By the way, that was really funny. Did you get it from Patrick O'brian, it sounds like him.
Unfortunately, he can. There is considerable precedent. For instance, Carter issued unconditional pardons to more than 50K draft dodgers, most of whom hadn't been indicted, much less convicted. Nixon had not been indicted for anything when Ford issued a full pardon for any wrongdoing he might have committed.
If Obama does issue a pardon, it's worth noting that presidential pardons cannot extend to state offenses. I'm sure the Clinton Crime Family has amassed plenty of those along the way.
the sources noted are intel sources
un mentioned were state department sources, underlings that are state department lifers that when squeezed will fess up. I don’t know who they are but know they will be interrogated and at least one will crack
I've thought about this, and I am not sure that she is not merely a cardboard figure holding a giant rice bowl. I mean she has a lot of people making a living propping her up, and if you look at her background, she has never done anything on her own. I think she is just a dumb **** who has always been manipulated, first by her husband and then by a long string of sketchy actors.
I don’t recall where I ran across the concept of the Tyburn Jig, but I believe I associated it with DWTS on my own.
Others may have made that association independently.
If not, well, then, that’s just part of my charm.
So far, there’s not enough to convict this oligarch. Hillary will throw Huma under the bus, create enough uncertainty and sympathy to beat Bernie, and find a way to demonize Comey, and proclaim it’s “old news” in the general election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.