Posted on 01/24/2016 8:35:29 AM PST by Kaslin
That’s actually pretty funny, isn’t it?
“against “establishment” (insider) Republicans, namely, Florida Sen. Florida Man, former Florida Gov. Florida Man ...
Appears to be another brain freeze.
Hillary, who finished THIRD in the 2008 Iowa caucuses, hasn’t gotten more likable since then.
Trump could lock up the nomination now by stating that, upon assuming POTUS, he will call for a review of the evidence. If the review finds evidence of a crime the Trump Administration’s Attorney General will prosecute Hillary as well as former Attorney General Loretta Lynch for malfeasance in office, as well as FBI Director Comey if he did not present the evidence to AG Lynch. Not stopping there, Trump should say that he will investigate Obama’s birth certificate and if fraud is found will prosecute not only Obama, but all enablers, including former FBI Director Mueller for malfeasance in office for not preventing this treasonous fraud.
It's an old formula and not always successful but it does confer a considerable advantage. The strategy is to pound the opposition candidate in the media to the point where "lesser of two evils" mantra will permit Democrats to vote without really considering what they're doing. That is historically a dismaying easy thing to do with the sort of control over the media that the Democrats enjoy.
However, there is the hazard that disappointed Bernie enthusiasts - there are more of them than one might like to think - will not be swayed and treat the whole thing for the cheat that it is, as a certain number of Republicans have with McCain and Romney. Was it a significant number? In '08, possibly not, in '12, probably so.
The woman is unlikable, untrustworthy, and unfit for any office at all because she's proven corrupt in every one she's held. One is used to the customary derision that all politicians should be in jail - it's true more often than not - but this one really ought to be in prison in a very literal sense. Before Trump and Cruz nobody dared to use that as a campaign talking point, which is why she has gotten away with what she has for as long as she has. A McCain or a Romney would consider it un-collegial. Cruz and Trump had better not.
Well, let’s hope Loretta Lynch doesn’t start doing that.
Are you still in OC? It was a hoppin’ place, but I escaped in 2002.
Well he would have to include well over 90 % of those in congress all of the left wing media
You may soon know Sanchez as a Senator, she’s running for Boxer’s seat. The dem power brokers favor AG Kamala Harris though, I guess a light shade of Black trumps Latina even in California. Sanchez had a bit of a faux pas when she said “5-20% of Muslims want a Caliphate”. Her maximum of 20% is lower than my minimum but that kind of comment isn’t helpful in dem races.
Because of Cali’s awful top-two primary and the fact than several Republicans are running, none of them particularity prominent, a State Assemblyman is the leader of the pack, Harris and Sanchez and may face each other in November. That would suck.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.