So trump didn’t take this woman to court in order to steal her property?
Drill down to the actual summation statement in the thread, at the ad site, and in Tedâs tweet;
âThis is actually a pretty good ad exposing how Trump has used eminent domain to bulldoze an elderly womanâs home to create a limo parking lot for his casino:â
That statement asserts - as fact - the following;
- An elderly womanâs home was bulldozed.
- Trump used eminent domain to bulldoze the womanâs home.
- a parking lot was built where the home was.
All three in factual reality are not true. They are lies.
Do you not have a problem with using lies to make a point? If there is a need to lie to make a point all credibility as a truth supporter disappears in a flash of short circuited logic.
Is that not a problem?? If not why not??
Drill down to the actual summation statement in the thread, at the ad site, and in Ted’s tweet;
“This is actually a pretty good ad exposing how Trump has used eminent domain to bulldoze an elderly woman’s home to create a limo parking lot for his casino:”
That statement asserts - as fact - the following;
- An elderly woman’s home was bulldozed.
- Trump used eminent domain to bulldoze the woman’s home.
- a parking lot was built where the home was.
All three in factual reality are not true. They are lies.
Do you not have a problem with using lies to make a point? If there is a need to lie to make a point all credibility as a truth supporter disappears in a flash of short circuited logic.
Is that not a problem?? If not why not??