Drill down to the actual summation statement in the thread, at the ad site, and in Ted’s tweet;
“This is actually a pretty good ad exposing how Trump has used eminent domain to bulldoze an elderly woman’s home to create a limo parking lot for his casino:â€
That statement asserts - as fact - the following;
- An elderly woman’s home was bulldozed.
- Trump used eminent domain to bulldoze the woman’s home.
- a parking lot was built where the home was.
All three in factual reality are not true. They are lies.
Do you not have a problem with using lies to make a point? If there is a need to lie to make a point all credibility as a truth supporter disappears in a flash of short circuited logic.
Is that not a problem?? If not why not??
It’s inaccurate in the details but the base event occurred.
Trump used eminent domain against the woman to make a parking lot. She’s fortunate she had the money for a lawyer or he would have won.
Glossing over that fact makes you a liar.
The ad in question squatted and dropped a flat-out lie in stating that eminent domain actions “made Trump rich”.
Right now, the property is a vacant lot because the person who bought the property in 2014 decided to demolish the building.
The Trump eminent domain action occurred in 1993.
This is a legitimate issue, and I don’t agree with Trump’s view on this, but Cruz should be ashamed of himself for allowing that sleazy dishonest ad to air.
Ted should issue a correction. Tell the world trump tried to take the woman’s property through eminent domain. But he is a loser and was beaten by a little old lady.