Punish her accordingly.
Posted on 01/23/2016 12:05:06 PM PST by Kaslin
Little ones first so they'll sing first? Or all at once so they all sing at once?
Paralysis of analysis - is it safer for the Democrats to simply sidle up to Herself and “strongly suggest” that her campaign for the Democrat nomination to the Presidential race be abandoned; or do they bring formal charges, with the resulting collateral damage to the rest of the Democrat party; or do they just let Herself go ahead with gaining the nomination, and face the voters in November?
Man, that is just going to be trickier than arithmetic.
The Democrats may have to take one right in the heart before they get the message.
Nixon did not have this much $#!+ headed his way when he resigned, and the Republicans suffered for years afterward.
Punish her accordingly.
Obama DOJ will never ever charge Hillary.
They don’t have to. She’s already being tried.
One thing that argues against it is the fact that if you take these charges seriously, you have to consider that the sitting POTUS is responsible for having named a corrupt Secretary of State, and not realizing that the server was a national security issue - and not putting the kibosh on it.Obama really should also be on the hot seat over this. Trust me, any Republican POTUS would be.
Of course not, but the Pentagon is considering demoting General David Petraeus, even though what he did was 1/10 or even less than what she did.
Without a doubt.
It is long past time to charge Hillary. In fact she will never face proper charges. At most she will face some weak, small charge that makes it seem she presided over a clerical error...if any at all.
Nothing. Will. Happen. To. Her.
That would not surprise me one bit.
< defense type=”clintonesque” >
“This is a witch hunt that has been engineered by the vast right wing conspiracy to undermine my candidacy. It is purely political and shameful”
< /defense >
The Clinton’s have stolen enough. You’d think they were greedy, or something. Wanting the White House again could be the end of them. I hope so.
Ah, but have you forgotten about Chelsea? Hubbel?
From the story:
“No criminality can be charged against Mrs. Clinton in connection with any of this absent proof that she had what the law regards as a guilty state of mind...”
IOW, As long as Mrs. Clinton thinks she can do whatever she wants with impunity, she can.
She should have been charged long ago. But better late than never. That is if L. Lynch feels like doing her job. She might be too busy going after those who dare to speak out against Muslims.
Maybe we can start with the one dealing with the massive sale of US uranium assets to Russia for huge bucks by a "charitable friend"?
At what point does massive criminality descend into blatant treason?
The Clintons do nothing for free. Everything is for sale at the right price, including the United States
As recipient of the email, she knew of the personal risk involved, as did the SENDER!
In view of the incredible risk, both the Beast and originator of the email expected huge monetary returns.
Just who sent this email and to whom and for what purpose did someone or country pay an enormous sum?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.