Posted on 01/23/2016 11:09:08 AM PST by Drew68
This is one of a number of reasons I do not go to movie theaters anymore.
“...tossing a gun clip into the trash.”
Sigh.
Was this an AMC theater where they serve booze?
When I was in my early twenties, I took my young family several times to a neighborhood theater at a nearby shopping center. It was a rough neighborhood.
Whenever something exciting happened in a movie, the whole audience would erupt into gleeful screaming, yelling, laughing and jumping up and down. It was hilarious! The second time we went and thereafter, we joined in. It was a hoot!
Many people in the theater carried weapons. It was a fact and rule in that area, that nearly everyone carried weapons. There was never a shooting in that movie theater that I know of.
Maybe some classes of people are simply more clumsy with tools and mechanical devices than others.
Sit in the back row and carry a weapon.
Out of this story that’s all you can comment about?
Chances are he will get sued by the victim and rightfully so. Even if he has some kind of insurance he is out of luck. Being stupid sucks for everybody. It certainly did for the victim.
Leave evidence behind, flee the scene, don’t report it to police...
Glad I won’t be on his jury. While one action might have been an exercise of gross negligence (I see nothing to qualify it as an accident), the rest in my book is criminal.
The guy was drunk. I'm pretty sure concealed carry while intoxicated is a violation of the permit. This moron needs to be made an example of. If you are going to concealed carry, you'd better take it seriously. Drunken jackasses fumbling their weapons and shooting innocent people are exactly what the opponents of CCW warned us against.
Nah.
I would rather just PPV it and watch it at home. My popcorn is better anyway.
At home I also enjoy the security and safety of my German Shepherd.
She doesn’t tolerate cell phones, or people who keep talking or that damn cat either!
I’ll go out on a limb here...
I think bolobaby’s brief comment was tied into the larger theme of the normal misreporting perpetrated on the general public, by the media, when there are weapons involved. While the report seems to be pretty straight forward, how can we depend on honest reporting when the reporter does not understand the subject matter?
The “clip” was, more than likely, a magazine.
Seems we have criminal negligence, criminal attempt to dispose of evidence, criminal fleeing the scene of a crime.
His being a total dork has allowed him to become a criminal and prison awaits.
Though stuff like this is going to happen in a free society, I don’t want to take away anyone’s guns. I must be blind?
There is one individual in one of my circles of friends that has caused two negligent discharges in the presence of some of us during range sessions. (not in my presence or he would have never come around for the second) He can own as many guns as he wants, he just can’t let us know he has one on him when he is near any of us.
Meh. The rest is general stupidity which gives gun owners a bad name.
Waste of a perfectly good gun clip, it seems. Why would someone toss the clip but keep the gun and ammo?
Here’s a company that makes gun clips. Wonder if it was one of theirs.
http://technaclip.com/index.php/gun-belt-clips.html
This is how the gun-grabbers do it. Just wait for an idiot to hurt someone accidentally with a gun, and then they’re off to the races. This story will soon go national, and when it does, the drumbeat to outlaw concealed carry will be sounded by the media. The gun-grabbers do not care about the Heller or McDonald decisions, and neither does the blackmailed Supreme Court.
I’m gonna put on my tinfoil hat here, and say this is one more shooting incident that too neatly feeds the Obama narrative.
The guy has a CCW. He goes to the Benghazi movie fearing a mass shooting??? The Benghazi movie? Really? (Audience for THIS movie, including/especially the shooter, likely to be conservatives, thus painting “right wing gun nuts” as “dangerous extremists” who should have their guns taken.) Then he “accidentally” shoots a woman? Then disposes of evidence where it will immediately be found? (BTW, a too-convenient subliminal message: don’t go see the Benghazi movie. You might get shot by a right-wing extremist!)
Gimme a break.
The thought of government operatives being assigned to shoot random innocent citizens, to promote an anti-gun agenda would have been paranoid lunacy in years past. Not anymore.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I would not put anything past this administration.
And, oh yeah: “The suspect has not been identified.”
We can be told he’s 29, but not his name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.