But Walker’s record is SOLID (you cannot say the same for Trump].
From your link:
“....Throughout his nine years in the state Assembly, Walker was a reliable vote on pro-life issues, siding with Wisconsin Right to Life on 73 of 74 votes scored by the group. He also was the lead sponsor on a bill aimed at letting pharmacists refuse to fill birth control prescriptions if it conflicts with their moral beliefs.
Since taking office as governor in 2011, Walker has signed legislation to slash state funding for Planned Parenthood, increase oversight of abortion clinics and require doctors to perform ultrasounds before performing abortions.
Democrats, not surprisingly, were eager to exploit the disagreement between Walker and his staffer.”....
If the ‘record’ then is so paramount, what is the purpose of using the Spokeswoman’s leanings as prima facie evidence?
It speaks of other qualifiers than just one’s position on a particular issue, but perhaps competence and ability maybe?
His detractors are going after her using implied anti-white leanings because they aren’t having any luck attacking the man by himself.
Good luck with all that.