Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Pawns for the Democrats
Townhall.com ^ | January 22, 2016 | Linda Chavez

Posted on 01/22/2016 12:58:00 PM PST by Kaslin

The Supreme Court decided this week to take up the Obama administration's unilateral executive actions on immigration, which will keep the issue on the front burner for the presidential election. That's bad news for Republicans, including Donald Trump. It was bound to happen, of course. The administration has been nothing if not Machiavellian when it comes to playing the immigration issue for all it is worth.

In November 2014, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson issued a series of memoranda that, in effect, delayed indefinitely the deportation of illegal immigrants who were parents to American-born children. The move also granted them permission to work in the U.S. Of course the overwhelming majority of these people were not going to be deported anyway -- two thirds have been living here 10 years or more -- and the majority were already working, albeit not with proper authorization. The administration's actions, therefore, did very little to change the status quo for illegal immigrants beyond giving them a false sense of security. Meanwhile, several states sued and the executive actions were put on hold while the case wends its way through the courts.

Without actual changes to U.S. law, illegal immigrants remain political pawns of whoever happens to be in power. The Democrats say they will protect them; but a Democrat president who enjoyed two full years of his presidency with Democrats in control of both houses of Congress chose not to change the law. Most Republicans have simply punted on the issue, except for Donald Trump, who promises he'll deport them all, which is a real crowd-pleaser among the voters he courts but will come back to bite him if he manages to win the GOP nomination.

Hispanic voters are not monolithic -- as I have been writing for three decades. A majority usually supports the Democratic nominee in presidential elections, but GOP candidates have won from a third to more than 40 percent of Hispanic votes in a majority of elections going back to Richard Nixon. A new report from the Pew Research Center shows that naturalizations and the growing number of Hispanic youth attaining voting age has pushed the number of potential Hispanic voters to 27.3 million, roughly 12 percent of the voting-eligible population.

As the Hispanic electorate grows, Republicans increasingly need to win more Hispanic votes to be competitive in states such as Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Florida (where non-Cuban Hispanics now outnumber the more Republican-leaning Cuban-American population) and even Virginia, which has grown more Democratic in recent years. Pushing a line on illegal immigrants that we should "round 'em up and kick 'em out" will simply shove Hispanics into the Democrats' arms for generations. Democrats will shake their heads in sympathy all the way to Inauguration Day.

The Supreme Court is likely to issue its decision in June or early July, by which time the parties will likely have settled on a nominee even if the conventions will be weeks away. The decision could inject an issue back into the campaign at a time when it may have withered away. I expect the decision to be closely divided, and it could leave a muddled mess. Conservatives, including me, are hoping that the Court will slap down the administration's abuse of executive power. I'd like to see resolution of the status of long-term illegal immigrants, but I believe that Congress must act -- not the president alone -- if we ever hope to solve the problem in the long run. But I think it is quite likely the Court will avoid dealing with the substance and rule narrowly on whether the administration followed proper procedure in taking the executive actions.

No one will be satisfied with such a decision, which will dump it right back into the political maelstrom. The Democrat nominee will use the fear of mass deportations to drive young Hispanics to register and turn out to vote. When you add large numbers of new Hispanic voters to the ranks of Democrats' solid base among blacks, union members and single women, the path to the White House for a Republican nominee becomes much steeper. No matter who the GOP nominee is, if he's smart he'll wish the immigration issue would simply go away.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/22/2016 12:58:00 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

More Cheap Labor Express propaganda from Linda Chavez


2 posted on 01/22/2016 1:05:19 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bfl


3 posted on 01/22/2016 1:11:42 PM PST by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

“More Cheap Labor Express propaganda from Linda Chavez”

Another “Fake Conservative!”


4 posted on 01/22/2016 1:16:51 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

You don’t seem to be worried about the Islamic terrorists coming in, why is that?


5 posted on 01/22/2016 1:29:37 PM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Of course I am, have you read my tagline?
The jihadis are using the illegal aliens from Central America as cover.
Stop them all.
Deport them all.


6 posted on 01/22/2016 1:39:16 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
If you feel like it, join in the Free Republic Caucus (each day)

Thank you.  Be sure to read the rules and follow them so your candidate will benefit from your vote.

LINK to Caucus 01/22/2016

A link to yesterday'sresults is at the bottom of the top post.  (under construction)

Folks, if you haven't already and can manage it now, please support the FReepathon.  Thank you.  LINK

We've very lucky to have this forum where we can debate the issues of the day.

7 posted on 01/22/2016 1:39:43 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Free Republic Caucus: vote daily / watch for the thread / Starts 01/20 midnight to midnight EDST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

An accurate description of reality.


8 posted on 01/22/2016 1:42:39 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

One of the most disturbing things about Trump:

He says (as Cruz does) that he’ll revoke all of 0bama’s executive orders. Taht’s good.

When he wsa talkign to NBC about that, he was asked if that meant he was opposed to gverning by executive order.

Unlike Cruz, Trump simply answered, “I’ll do good ones.”

IOW, he doesn’t oppose the unconstitutional idea of governing by EO. He just thinks he can do better ones than Zero can (which is likely.)

But it’s not just the content of BO’s executive orders that disturbs constitutionalists and other Americans. It’s the idea of governing by “a pen and a phone” instead of through the legislative process, as the Constitution requires.

I have a problem with that.


9 posted on 01/22/2016 3:41:30 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson