Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'm sure a Mexican Flag, Brown Power, New Black Panther Flag, images of Che, Mao and (especially) the Gay Flag are A-OK.


1 posted on 01/22/2016 9:58:23 AM PST by Bon of Babble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Bon of Babble
What a PC crock of 0bama.

The uniform would hide the tat.

It ain't your daddy's Corps.

2 posted on 01/22/2016 10:00:15 AM PST by PROCON (Proud CRUZader!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

Because of the color of his skin? So the USMC rejects whites these days? Go back home, Jethro.


3 posted on 01/22/2016 10:00:40 AM PST by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble
Trump and Cruz will have their hands full, trying to put this country back together again.

A lot of the brass in the military needs to be shown the door.

4 posted on 01/22/2016 10:01:25 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (With Trump & Cruz, America can't lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

I’ll be waiting for the official response from the USMC,

PS - guys, I’m 63 and use TriCare, so don’t drag your feet.

;-)


5 posted on 01/22/2016 10:01:57 AM PST by tgusa (gun control: hitting your target.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

The black ISIS would be acceptable too


6 posted on 01/22/2016 10:02:00 AM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

Maybe things have changed, but when my son joined the Marines in 2009, they wouldn’t accept anyone with a tattoo.


7 posted on 01/22/2016 10:02:01 AM PST by kevslisababy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

Outrageous that he would be rejected.


8 posted on 01/22/2016 10:02:43 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

File this under “More to the story than is being reported”.


10 posted on 01/22/2016 10:03:20 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

But if it was a rainbow flag, he would be made head of the Joint Chiefs of Satff.


11 posted on 01/22/2016 10:04:06 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

USMC regs used to be no tattoos viable above the collar or below the shirt cuff.

Obama has probably added a slew of “preferences”.


15 posted on 01/22/2016 10:07:07 AM PST by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble


17 posted on 01/22/2016 10:09:03 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

Had Max Klinger only known, would have saved him a complete wardrobe


18 posted on 01/22/2016 10:10:32 AM PST by bigbob ("Victorious warriors win first ande then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

The whole thing about tattoos started under Clinton. At one time he ordered that the Army (other services too, I’m sure) examine all serving members for “racist” tattoos. Those with such tattoos were then either required to have something tattooed over them, or be discharged. I worked for the Veterans Administration, and saw several vets who had Celtic crosses on their lower legs who had been discharged for that very reason.

However, gang tattoos and racial tattoos on minorities were not to be observed or punished.


21 posted on 01/22/2016 10:21:01 AM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

great tattoo, where can I get one?


22 posted on 01/22/2016 10:21:01 AM PST by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble; PROCON; 353FMG; tgusa; central_va

I do not if it is still true today, but in WW II the Marine Corps attracted a disproportionate share of enlistees from former Confederate states. In the Civil War the Army was hugely expanded and the Marine Corps very little. Therefore, Southerners would say that were willing to serve the country, but not in any goddamnyankee outfit. And yes, goddamnyankee is one word, and no it is not profanity.

The tattoo makes a statement about a vital aspect of our military heritage. This country owes as much to the South as the North. But now to serve popular morality, we must banish from history the Confederate battle flag and those who served under it. Responding to these assertions, I quote Joshua Chamberlain who received the Confederate surrender at Appomattox.

“Before us in proud humiliation stood the embodiment of manhood: men whom neither toils and sufferings, nor the fact of death, nor disaster, nor hopelessness could bend from their resolve; standing before us now, thin, worn, and famished, but erect, and with eyes looking level into ours, waking memories that bound us together as no other bond;—was not such manhood to be welcomed back into a Union so tested and assured?”

Winston Churchill commented concerning American entry into WW II that victory was then assured, because our Civil War demonstrated the tenacity required to defeat the Nazis.


23 posted on 01/22/2016 10:23:20 AM PST by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble
All he has to say is that he is gay or on the wait list for gender re-assignment surgery.

Seriously though...what a joke. We truly live in upside down world.

24 posted on 01/22/2016 10:28:58 AM PST by MCOAvalanche
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

Obola’s even debased the Marine Corps.Stand by,boys and girls,for Josh Earnest (my God,is that *really* his name?) to announce that the taking of Mount Suribachi was a racist act.


27 posted on 01/22/2016 10:39:24 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obamanomics:Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

United States Marine’s Tattoo Policies

UNCLAS 191708Z MAR 07
CMC WASHINGTON DC(UC)
AL MARADMIN(UC)
MARADMIN
MARADMIN 198/07
MSGID/GENADMIN/CMC WASHINGTON DC//

Subj/Announcement Of Changes To The Marine Corps Tattoo Policy//

REF/A/MSGID:DOC/CMC WASHINGTON DC MCUB/YMD:20030331//

POC/S. T. FOSTER/CAPT/-/-/TEL:COMM 703 784 9387/TEL:DSN 278 9387//

NARR/REF A MCO P1020.34G,

Marine Corps Uniform Regulations// GENTEXT/

1. Purpose. To detail revisions and additions to the Tattoo Policy found in MCO P1020.34G, Marine Corps Uniform Regulations.

2. Effective 1 April 2007, paragraph 1004.1c of MCO P1020.34G, Marine Corps uniform regulations, is cancelled and replaced with the following paragraph. “... Marines are prohibited from:

C. Tattoos or brands on the head and neck. Sleeve tattoos are likewise prohibited. A sleeve tattoo is a very large tattoo, or a collection of smaller tattoos, that covers or almost covers a person’s entire arm or leg. Half-sleeve or quarter-sleeve tattoos that are visible to the eye when wearing standard PT gear (t-shirt and shorts) are likewise prohibited. A half-sleeve or quarter-sleeve tattoo is defined as a very large tattoo, or a collection of smaller tattoos that covers, or almost covers, the entire portion of an arm or leg above or below the elbow or knee. Tattoos or brands that are prejudicial to good order, discipline and morale, or are of a nature to bring discredit upon the Marine Corps are also prohibited. Prejudicial to good order, discipline and morale, or are of a nature to bring discredit upon the Marine corps may include, but are not limited to, any tattoo that is sexist, racist, vulgar, anti-American, anti-social, gang related, or extremist group or organization related.”

3. The following new suparagraphs 1004.1c(1) and 1004.1c(2) are added.

”(1) Marines who currently have a sleeve tattoo(s) will be Grandfathered. The Marine’s command will insert a photograph(s) of the respective tattoo(s) along with a measurement(s) of the size in inches and of the location(s) on the body and the date the tattoo(s) was documented, on the page 11 of the Marine’s SRB. The Marine will sign the page 11 entry verifying the information is correct.”

“(2) The Deputy Commandant For Manpower And Reserve Affairs is designated as the adjudicating authority for any tattoo issue involving retention or special duty assignments. Review of a questionable tattoo(s) will be submitted to DC M&RA (MM) via the Reenlistment, Extension, Lateral Move System (RELMS). The package will include a photograph(s) of the tattoo(s), measurement(s) of the size in inches, description of the location(s) and explanation as to why the tattoo(s) has been deemed questionable by the Commander.”

4. Commander’s are required to educate all their Marines on the new policy and document any Marine that requires grandfathering by 1 July 2007.//


29 posted on 01/22/2016 10:45:48 AM PST by Garvin (Age does not guarantee wisdom, and a college degree does not guarantee intelligence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

Can’t risk your life with the wrong tatoo.


30 posted on 01/22/2016 10:56:59 AM PST by Calpublican (A.G. Lynch: The intent of this statement is to incite violence against radical Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bon of Babble

You think they will reconsider when China comes knoocking?


31 posted on 01/22/2016 11:05:26 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson