Posted on 01/22/2016 8:35:23 AM PST by Kaslin
Some time ago I said that many establishment Republicans dislike Ted Cruz so much that they would even back their nemesis, Donald Trump, if necessary to keep Cruz from winning. This is one time I wish I had been wrong.
The establishment has long held Cruz in contempt but didn't believe he had any realistic chance of securing the GOP nomination. Now, with his campaign success, he's scaring their pants off. Former Republican presidential candidate Bob Dole has issued apocalyptic warnings against nominating Cruz, and I've just received an email that Sen. Orrin Hatch prefers Trump over Cruz as well.
Earlier this week, it was New York Times pretend-conservative columnist David Brooks who suggested a Republican conspiracy against Cruz and Trump in favor of any other GOP candidate. "Very few presidents are so terrible," he wrote, "that they genuinely endanger their own nation, but Trump and Cruz would go there and beyond." Setting aside this mindless conflation of Cruz and Trump, do you believe we should be taking advice about potentially bad presidents from a guy who drooled over candidate Barack Obama because of his trousers?
More and more insiders fear Cruz far more than Trump. Trump drives the establishment batty by ginning up his supporters against them and for his current hardline stance on immigration, but they have to know it hasn't been that long since Trump espoused a number of liberal positions and financially supported establishment figureheads in each party. As hard-nosed and independent as he seems, his track record reveals he is much more malleable and they'd have a better chance to influence him than Cruz.
Ted Cruz, on the other hand, has been a thorn in the establishment's side since he came on the scene. Insiders are astounded that he has actually refused to abandon his campaign promises and his commitment to Reagan conservatism, despite overwhelming pressure and derision from the party and its power brokers.
They have concluded that Cruz must be driven by egomania and not principle. Who but a stubborn, opportunistic loner could resist the temptation to rub elbows with the power brokers once elected? Only oddballs honor their constituents and grassroots conservative causes above those of the ruling class. Only charlatans continue to articulate conservative ideas with passionate optimism and idealism once in office. Only zealots evince an abiding dedication to Reagan conservative principles beyond what's necessary to get them elected. Only grandstanders would truly stand up to President Obama's reckless budget demands instead of throwing in the towel of surrender before the fight has even begun.
Why is it automatically presumed that Obama will win every game of chicken he insists on playing with Republicans? Why can't our side ever be confident enough in its own ideas and of the American people -- as Ted Cruz is -- to believe the people will back us if we call Obama's bluff and articulate our case to them? The establishment's rationale for caving has always been that Republicans, being the party of less government, can never win over the public in a shutdown showdown. They think that Cruz knows this too, but puts on a grandiose but futile show to play to the base and advance his political ambitions. Oh ye of little faith -- little faith, that is, in the conservative ideas you maintain you embrace. If only the establishment would join Cruz in promoting the principles they say they share, just as Democrats always support an uncompromising and extremist Obama, there's no telling what progress we could have made in thwarting some of Obama's agenda.
As I see it, there are two major differences between Republican supporters and opponents of Cruz. One is that his supporters are more consistently conservative on every category of issues. The fight, in other words, is not just about strategy, as the establishment insists, but also involves policy.
The second is that Cruz's supporters believe he is a man of integrity. Many of his detractors contend he is a phony, but I think their real fear is that he is not. He will not change his positions for expedience -- though many are working overtime to convince us otherwise.
The establishment, then, either believes or wants to fool us into believing that it opposes Cruz because he is a poseur, a saboteur of good government -- a man who impedes the cause of conservatism by his unwavering commitment to it. Only by compromise and pragmatism, they argue, can we really advance conservative principles.
The truth, however, is that they are not as committed to conservative principles as they say they are and don't regard the current problems confronting our nation with the same degree of urgency as mainstream conservatives. They also place a high value on process -- on bipartisanship and collegiality for their own sake -- even over advancing a conservative agenda. Not long ago I read that one establishment icon said he didn't think a Hillary presidency would be that bad. Seriously?
We finally have a candidate who is committed to conservative principles across the board, a man who reveres the Constitution and America, as founded, who acutely understands the destruction President Obama has wrought, and who we can rely on to fulfill his promise to do everything in his power, if elected, to reverse this disastrous course and restore us on a path to recovery.
If the establishment would quit hyperventilating over Ted Cruz and get behind him they could do more than anything else to advance the cause they profess to believe in.
“Today’s big puzzle is how so many otherwise rational people have become enamored of Donald Trump, projecting onto him virtues and principles that he clearly does not have, and ignoring gross defects that are all too blatant.”
—Thomas Sowell
WOW Sowell has become senile.
How would anyone describe the folloing person:
Establishment or anti Establishment
Just another establishment phony ruse, to make a last ditch effort to stigmatize Trump. Sorry, but we’ve seen it all before.
I don’t think the Establishment has any fear of Cruz at all. Look at how he votes. Look at who his donors are. No, No, I mean the large ones, the open border crowd, the homosexual crowd, etc.
You forgot one.
8. Supported Corker Bill
The rational fear about Ted Cruz is that he can’t win.
Evidence: he’s losing the primary and appears to be losing even Iowa.
As soon as the government required health insurance on the part of all citizens, I determined no longer to seek or use it. Not only does this requirement break the law in requiring all citizens to buy/have it, but it is a gross overreach into the life and health of the individual citizen. I’m all in for a class action lawsuit against the government and health insurance providers. One should not have to buy insurance in order to receive and enjoy proper health care. In fact, the entire insurance industry has gotten way out of hand, lessening our personal responsibility toward ourselves and others, while increasing our inclination toward greed and entitlement.
“Very few presidents are so terrible,” (David Brooks) wrote, “that they genuinely endanger their own nation, but Trump and Cruz would go there and beyond.”
Is this guy talking about Trump/Cruz, or Obama?
Oh, that’s right. Obama has the perfect crease in his pants.
Do you realize that this Brooks, and these other non-producing mouths like Will and Krauthammer, are millionaires for doing nothing more than putting out drivel?
I would describe him as anti-establishment, anti-GOPe, and the only conservative in the race.
How would you describe this person, establishment or anti-establishment?
1. Contributed to Clinton Crime Foundation
2. Praised Hillary Clinton
3. Supports touch back amnesty
4. Supports Mitch McConnell
5. Supports crony capitalism
6. Supports de Blasio
7. Wants to raise taxes
8. Supported outlawing weapons
9. Opposed outlawing 3rd trimester abortions
10. Is supported by Hatch, Dole and Lott
Good list.
Why would they fear Cruz? He fits right in with them.
I now look at Thomas Sowell in the same way I’ve looked at Andy Griffith ever since he was bulls**ted by Ron Howard into doing a commercial supporting Hussein the monster in his first election run. The memory of Griffith will forever live in shame because of that lapse of judgment. Now Sowell, too, has become a deluded and senile old fool.
You’re opinion
For saying the obvious?
You forgot that he tried to take a widow’s house away from her, so he could built a parking lot for one of his casinos
No it’s factual, but you Trumpees are to blind to see that
Trent Lott endorsed Trump?
That widow was a loser anyway.
Trump likes women who’s husbands stay alive and don’t die.
Losers deserve to lose their homes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.