Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran: ‘We Welcome War with the United States’
PJ Media ^ | 1/21/2016 | Robert Spender

Posted on 01/22/2016 5:16:44 AM PST by HomerBohn

John Kerry said Monday that "the world is safer today" because of the Iran nuclear deal. Details of how loud and long the mullahs laughed have not been released.

In reality, the world is more threatened than ever by an aggressive and assertive Iran, confident and swaggering after besting Kerry at the negotiating table.

As the International Atomic Energy Agency certified Iran's compliance with the stipulations of the nuclear deal and the U.S. and EU ended sanctions against the Islamic Republic, the head of Iran's armed forces, Major General Hassan Firouzabadi, was not in a conciliatory mood. After Iran seized two U.S. Navy boats and briefly held ten American sailors hostage, Firouzabadi declared:

This incident in the Persian Gulf, which probably will not be the American forces' last mistake in the region, should be a lesson to troublemakers in the U.S. Congress.

And Hossein Salami, the deputy commander of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), crowed:

American sailors started crying after arrest, but the kindness of our Guard made them feel calm.

He added:

Since the end of the Second World War, no country has been able to arrest American military personnel.

There was more. Said IRGC commander Ahmad Dolabi:

I saw the weakness, cowardice, and fear of American soldiers myself. Despite having all of the weapons and equipment, they surrendered themselves with the first action of the guardians of Islam.

American forces receive the best training and have the most advanced weapons in the world, but they did not have the power to confront the Guard due to weakness of faith and belief.

They did not have the power to confront the Guard. One might almost get the impression that Dalabi thought of the incident as a battle in a larger war.

Indeed, Iranian spokesmen have been declaring their willingness, and even desire, to confront the U.S. militarily for quite some time. On February 11, 2014, the 35th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan said:

The Defense Ministry is working to ensure that the Iranian people are armed and ready to confront any enemy threat. Yesterday's successful test of Iranian-made ballistic missiles was also a crushing response to the nonsense of the American officials who frequently threaten Iran. It is a clear answer to their military option.

The Defense Ministry and the Iranian nation are always ready, and Iran will welcome it if the Americans again put themselves to the test and face the consequences. The Americans will again be defeated, just as they were in the Iran-Iraq war. If they implement their nonsense, the Iranian nation will hand them a crushing defeat.

This saber-rattling has long been common among Iranian officials. Firouzabadi once boasted:

Iran is prepared for the decisive war against the U.S. and the Zionist regime. ... Iran has been making plans, conducting maneuvers, and preparing its forces for this battle for years now.

In May 2014, senior Iranian commander Massoud Jazayeri warned that if the U.S. attacked Iran, not only would the result be "the annihilation of the Israeli regime," but war in the U.S. itself:

[The Americans] know that aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran would mean annihilation of Tel Aviv and spread of war into the United States.

Fadavi added:

Today the Americans and the entire world know that one of our operational goals is destroying U.S. Navy Forces.

A specific target would be aircraft carriers:

[Carriers] provide U.S. airpower in combat; therefore it is natural that we want to sink them ... destroying, annihilating, and sinking U.S. boats has and will be in our plans.

In February 2015, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps conducted a drill dubbed Great Prophet 9 in which Iranian forces destroyed a replica of an American aircraft carrier. IRGC commander Jafari said that the drill was intended to be a "message of (Iran's) might" to "extraterritorial powers."

Iranian TV coverage of the drill focused on a banner that read:

If the Americans are ready to be buried at the bottom of the waters of the Persian Gulf -- so be it.

This is a direct quotation from the father of the Islamic Republic, the Ayatollah Khomeini.

During this drill, the IRGC tested what it called a "new strategic weapon" that it said would be an important part of their coming war with the United States. Said Admiral Fadavi:

The new weapon will have a very decisive role in adding our naval power in confronting threats, particular by the Great Satan, the United States.

In May 2015, the IRGC's Salami actually said that Iran wanted war with the United States:

We have prepared ourselves for the most dangerous scenarios and this is no big deal and is simple to digest for U.S.; we welcome war with the U.S. as we do believe that it will be the scene for our success to display the real potentials of our power.

The lieutenant commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps, Navy General Alireza Tangsiri, was even more bellicose in October 2015, issuing this warning to the United States:

I declare now that if the enemy wants to spark a war against Iran, we will chase them even to the Gulf of Mexico and we will do it.

This war would involve jihad-martyrdom suicide attacks. Tangsiri:

[The Americans] have tested us once and if necessary, there are people who will blow up themselves with ammunitions to destroy the U.S. warships.

With the nuclear deal, has Iran now discarded all this bellicosity and rejoined the family of nations? Only the most naïve and self-deluded would bet the future on it.

But the most naïve and self-deluded -- Barack Obama, John Kerry, and their followers - happen to be placing our bets.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: evilobamaregime; ineptgovernment; johnfingkerry; prettiestsound
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Will they still spout this crap after the sissy in chief is gone? Obama makes Jimmy carter look like George Patton.

Meanwhile, back in North Korea.

1 posted on 01/22/2016 5:16:44 AM PST by HomerBohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

No need to spend any of that $150B we gave you in the name of securing peace and nukes, Iran. The current administration would just wave a white flag and surrender and invite you in.


2 posted on 01/22/2016 5:22:46 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

They won’t be so bold when we have an AMERICAN President.


3 posted on 01/22/2016 5:24:17 AM PST by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Iran lacks the ability to project for a shooting war with America.

the best they can do is to increase their current terrorist efforts.

loss of all their ports should bring them to the real bargaining table


4 posted on 01/22/2016 5:25:35 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

“Will they still spout this crap after the sissy in chief is gone? Obama makes Jimmy carter look like George Patton.
Meanwhile, back in North Korea.

If I recall, they still spouted even when Ronald Reagan was president. The critical difference was they didn’t do anything while RR was president. (Not after he bombed them once.) What Obama has done is make it impossible for a future president to respond with a measured and limited strike. You can’t slap the face of a nuclear power. So a future president only has the choice of taking their cr*p or killing millions. Obama is betting all future presidents must bow and scrape. His legacy will be much worse than Carter’s as eventually, millions will die as the result of his policies. Bush will be blamed.


5 posted on 01/22/2016 5:27:01 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Famous last words...there’s probably millions of Iranians who would love nothing more than to seek revenge against the ayatollahs.


6 posted on 01/22/2016 5:27:09 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you can�t avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.�)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

A simple blocking of their ports will do. No need to shoot.


7 posted on 01/22/2016 5:27:24 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bert

A simple blocking of their ports will do. No need to shoot. Mine the harbors and leave.


8 posted on 01/22/2016 5:27:58 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

I’ll think on that but at least one should be destroyed as an example


9 posted on 01/22/2016 5:32:12 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

But Barry said it would all be peace, love and Soul Train with Iran now. That’s what “the deal” was all about, right Barry?


10 posted on 01/22/2016 5:34:18 AM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
Iran lacks the ability to project for a shooting war with America.

But, I'd bet they could muck up the Straits of Hormuz. I wouldn't want to be stuck on a US ship there if hostilities broke out. Somebody (Russia, CHina) might sell them a lot of advanced anti-ship missiles.

11 posted on 01/22/2016 5:37:42 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

In April 2003, the Iranians were in deep lock down. They did not have a single military radar turned on, they were not flying any military aircraft. (I know this from more or less first hand information.) The *last* thing they wanted was a military conflict with the U.S., which they knew included a long overdue supersize shipment of whuppass.

Circumstances have changed.


12 posted on 01/22/2016 5:39:02 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Prendre cinq et rendre quatre ce n'est pas donner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Didn’t Hitler say something like that?

Under the current U.S. administration, I wouldn’t fear a war with the United States, either.


13 posted on 01/22/2016 5:41:13 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Prendre cinq et rendre quatre ce n'est pas donner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Maybe, but how I would love to see Donald Trump, Bibi Netanyahu, King Abdullah (I don’t know his first name), General al-Sisi (or his, either), & Vladimir Putin- acting in concert, turned loose on these (pardon me) sh!theads.
They have it coming.


14 posted on 01/22/2016 5:45:57 AM PST by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

when they muck up the straights Bandar Shapur (khomini) is gone

The Saudi’s et al will take it out


15 posted on 01/22/2016 5:46:18 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
I'm thinkin a lil payback is in order. The Persians have taunted us, taken our folks hostage and created havoc for decades. They need...to be corrected.
16 posted on 01/22/2016 5:46:24 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
But, I'd bet they could muck up the Straits of Hormuz.

The beauty of fracking is that the Straits of Hormuz is no longer a sensitive area. We can get our own oil now.

17 posted on 01/22/2016 5:48:11 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Although the Al Qods (shock troops for the Supreme Leader) and Hezbollah performed poorly in Syria, Russia remains an ally. Is there anyone here that believes Russia would not sell Iran S400 systems for the right price?

Is there any one here who thinks the US has a deployed working counter to the S400?

If not, then there is no attack on Iran by the US - whose mil offense is predicated on air supremacy - once those systems are purchased and deployed in Iran.

And yes they will continue to “spout” ... their objective is war, which they declared in 1979 and we ignored. The more dead the better, the Iranian leadership believes ... it is the 12ver way and their religion.


18 posted on 01/22/2016 5:49:18 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

We should have got some of our own damn oil elsewhere.


19 posted on 01/22/2016 5:49:56 AM PST by the_individual2014
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bert

...AND the loss of their refining capability would be fun, also.


20 posted on 01/22/2016 5:57:31 AM PST by T-Bone Texan (The economic collapse is imminent. Buy staple food and OTC meds now, before prices skyrocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson