I think the article raises some decent questions. That’s my take and I’m sure some would love to skewer me over a pig roast for saying it. Oh well...
I don’t always understand those section headlines and the justification or lack there-of for getting them myself.
The admins are exercising political and candidate bias before the primaries have even started.
Hell, it was even pulled from News-Current Events and Politics-Elections.
That does not reflect Jim's philosophies as I know them. He has in the past only banned articles in support of non-life issues, or articles in support of the candidate who lost in shame.
But I have not seen censorship outside those boundaries before the first vote was cast in the past.